Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_171944 AI generated

Preliminary reference on judicial precedent as a source of law for justice personnel salaries rejected as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_171944
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference (hotărâre prealabilă) submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal regarding the interpretation of a prior judicial decision on the salary of justice personnel. The dispute concerned whether Decision No. 36/2018 established judicial precedent as a source of law for the remuneration of staff in the justice system, a question the higher court declined to answer. The ruling, issued under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, is mandatory and final, leaving the lower court's pending case unresolved on this specific interpretive issue while maintaining the status quo of the referenced norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary reference on judicial precedent as a source of law for justice personnel salaries rejected as inadmissible: The dispute concerned whether Decision No. 36/2018 established judicial precedent as a source of law for the remuneration of staff in the justice system, a question the higher court declined to answer. The ruling, issued under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, is mandatory and final, leaving the lower court's pending case unresolved on this specific interpretive issue while maintaining the status quo of the referenced norms.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling source of law interpretation of the law preliminary question legal status e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision dismissing the preliminary reference is mandatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 14/2021
Judicial precedent as source of salary law in judicial personnel equalization disputes
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_228080
Admissibility of preliminary reference on interpretation of judicial salary coefficients for management functions under anti-discrimination and salary ordinances
ICCJ_230685
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; prior salary-law decision stands
ICCJ_237640
Admissibility of preliminary reference on validity of public salary methodological norms after enactment of Framework Law 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision dismissing the preliminary reference is mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 14 Dosar nr. 3360/1/2020

Ședința din 15 martie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 22061/3/2019, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile, cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept: interpretarea Deciziei nr. 36 din 4 iunie 2018, pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 606 din 16 iulie 2018, în sensul de a şti dacă instituie precedentul judiciar ca izvor de drept în materia salarizării personalului din justiţie.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 15 martie 2021.