Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_171877 AI generated

Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on civil liability timing in criminal proceedings when civil party joins after preliminary chamber and insurer refuses participation

Case Number ICCJ_171877
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference raised by the Brașov Court of Appeal regarding the admissibility of assessing an accused's civil liability for tort in criminal proceedings when the victim joins as a civil party after the preliminary chamber phase and the civil liability insurance company refuses to participate as a responsible party. The dispute concerned a procedural issue in criminal law involving the timing of civil party constitution and the participation of insurers in tort liability analysis. The dismissal was based on the inadmissibility of the specific legal question posed by the referring court under the applicable procedural norms governing the resolution of legal issues in criminal matters.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 477 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură penală; Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on civil liability timing in criminal proceedings when civil party joins after preliminary chamber and insurer refuses participation: The dispute concerned a procedural issue in criminal law involving the timing of civil party constitution and the participation of insurers in tort liability analysis. The dismissal was based on the inadmissibility of the specific legal question posed by the referring court under the applicable procedural norms governing the resolution of legal issues in criminal matters.

Keywords

AI generated
civil liability preliminary proceedings right of insurer procedural rights matter in dispute victim rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 477 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură penală
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision becomes obligatory from the date of its publication in the Official Monitor.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 477 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură penală

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision becomes obligatory from the date of its publication in the Official Monitor.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 3096/1/2020

Şedinţa din data de 18 februarie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Braşov – Secţia penală, în dosarul nr. 19055/197/2019, prin care se solicită pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă instanţa penală poate analiza elementele răspunderii civile delictuale a inculpatului în ipoteza în care persoana vătămată se constituie parte civilă cu respectarea termenului prevăzut de art. 20 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură penală, dar după finalizarea procedurii de cameră preliminară, iar asigurătorul de răspundere civilă auto refuză să participe în procesul penal ca parte responsabilă civilmente”.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.3 din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 18 februarie 2021.