Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_171147 AI generated

Applicability of military status amendments to pre-existing officers via reference question

Case Number ICCJ_171147
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the reference question submitted by the Court of Appeal Piteşti as inadmissible, leaving no decision on the merits of the underlying legal issue. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 52(4) of Law No. 80/1995 regarding the status of military personnel, specifically whether provisions introduced by Law No. 101/2019 apply retroactively to officers who transferred to the officer corps prior to that law's enactment. The rejection was based on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of preliminary questions for the resolution of legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 52 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 80/1995, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Applicability of military status amendments to pre-existing officers via reference question: The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 52(4) of Law No. 80/1995 regarding the status of military personnel, specifically whether provisions introduced by Law No. 101/2019 apply retroactively to officers who transferred to the officer corps prior to that law's enactment. The rejection was based on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of preliminary questions for the resolution of legal issues.

Keywords

AI generated
military personnel civil status retroactivity of a law grounds for cassation preliminary question Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 52 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 80/1995
„Dispoziţiile art. 52 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 80/1995 privind statutul cadrelor militare, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, introduse prin Legea nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 9/2021
Retrospective application of military rank upgrades based on service length to officers promoted before statutory amendment.
ICCJ_192810
Temporal application of military rank assignment statute: Non-retroactivity of service-based promotion rules to officers commissioned before legislative amendment
ICCJ_192461
Applicability of 2019 military status amendments to officers transferred before the new law's entry into force
Decizia nr. 233/2025
Preliminary referral on military legal adviser's public office classification ruled inadmissible as interpretive question.
Decizia nr. 742/2003
Retirement of military officer rank: Non-retroactivity of administrative challenge statute bar for pre-effective-date acts

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 9 Dosar nr. 3144/1/2020

Şedinţa din 15 februarie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 3428/90/2019, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dispoziţiile art. 52 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 80/1995 privind statutul cadrelor militare, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, introduse prin Legea nr. 101/2019 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 80/1995, se interpretează în sensul că, de la data intrării lor în vigoare, se aplică şi persoanelor prevăzute de art. 36 alin. (1) lit. e) şi h) din Legea nr. 80/1995, care au trecut în corpul ofiţerilor anterior Legii nr. 101/2019 ?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 15 februarie 2021.