Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_171143 AI generated

Scope of “personnel appointed/employed” for public sector salary purposes: inclusion of personnel re-employed under Framework Law No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_171143
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting through the Panel for Resolving Legal Issues, issued a mandatory preliminary ruling that "personnel appointed/employed" under Article 39(4) read in conjunction with Article 39(1) of the Framework Law No. 153/2017 includes personnel re-employed under Article 36 of the same law, thereby resolving the legal question referred by the Court of Appeal of Iași regarding the scope of salary provisions for public sector employees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 36 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of “personnel appointed/employed” for public sector salary purposes: inclusion of personnel re-employed under Framework Law No. 153/2017: 153/2017 includes personnel re-employed under Article 36 of the same law, thereby resolving the legal question referred by the Court of Appeal of Iași regarding the scope of salary provisions for public sector employees.

Keywords

AI generated
public employment law public sector appointment of a public official scope of the legislation contract staff designated employment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 36 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017
The specific provision regarding re-employment whose inclusion in the category of 'appointed personnel' was determined by the court's order.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
The procedural rule cited to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding on the referring court.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 39 alin. (4) raportat la art. 39 alin. (1) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017

The substantive provision at the core of the preliminary ruling, defining the scope of salary provisions for appointed personnel.

art. 36 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017

The specific provision regarding re-employment whose inclusion in the category of 'appointed personnel' was determined by the court's order.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

The procedural rule cited to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding on the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 3118/1/2020

Ședința din 8 februarie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi - Secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 2424/89/2018*, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 39 alin. (4) raportat la art. 39 alin. (1) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în categoria „personalului numit/încadrat”, la care se referă prevederile art. 39 alin. (4) raportat la art. 39 alin. (1) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, este inclus şi personalul reîncadrat în baza prevederilor art. 36 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 8 februarie 2021.