Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_171139 AI generated

Temporal limit of forced execution suspension pending first-instance objection resolution under Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure

Case Number ICCJ_171139
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania's Full Court for Appeals in the Public Interest admitted the appeal filed by the People’s Advocate, establishing as mandatory legal doctrine that the phrase “until the resolution of the objection to execution” in Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure limits the suspension of forced execution solely until the first-instance decision on such an objection. The dispute concerned the interpretive scope of procedural rules governing the suspension of enforcement measures during the pendency of objections to execution, a challenge raised to clarify the temporal boundaries of the stay. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, read in conjunction with the mandatory effect of such interpretations under Article 517(4) of the same Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Temporal limit of forced execution suspension pending first-instance objection resolution under Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure: The dispute concerned the interpretive scope of procedural rules governing the suspension of enforcement measures during the pendency of objections to execution, a challenge raised to clarify the temporal boundaries of the stay. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, read in conjunction with the mandatory effect of such interpretations under Article 517(4) of the same Code.

Keywords

AI generated
stay of enforcement Civil Procedure Code procedural objections enforcement of ruling legal doctrine effects, scope and limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă
Main ground for the verdict, as the court established the specific interpretation of the suspension period under this article.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule establishing the mandatory binding force of the interpretation adopted by the court.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă

Main ground for the verdict, as the court established the specific interpretation of the suspension period under this article.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule establishing the mandatory binding force of the interpretation adopted by the court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 2 Dosar nr. 2969/1/2020

Şedinţa din 8 februarie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE: Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Avocatul Poporului şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că: În interpretarea şi aplicarea sintagmei „până la soluţionarea contestaţiei la executare” din cuprinsul art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, suspendarea executării silite este limitată în timp până la soluţionarea în primă instanţă a contestaţiei la executare. Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 8 februarie 2021.