Temporal limit of forced execution suspension pending first-instance objection resolution under Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Romania's Full Court for Appeals in the Public Interest admitted the appeal filed by the People’s Advocate, establishing as mandatory legal doctrine that the phrase “until the resolution of the objection to execution” in Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure limits the suspension of forced execution solely until the first-instance decision on such an objection. The dispute concerned the interpretive scope of procedural rules governing the suspension of enforcement measures during the pendency of objections to execution, a challenge raised to clarify the temporal boundaries of the stay. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, read in conjunction with the mandatory effect of such interpretations under Article 517(4) of the same Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Temporal limit of forced execution suspension pending first-instance objection resolution under Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure: The dispute concerned the interpretive scope of procedural rules governing the suspension of enforcement measures during the pendency of objections to execution, a challenge raised to clarify the temporal boundaries of the stay. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, read in conjunction with the mandatory effect of such interpretations under Article 517(4) of the same Code.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedMain ground for the verdict, as the court established the specific interpretation of the suspension period under this article.
Procedural rule establishing the mandatory binding force of the interpretation adopted by the court.
Full text
R O M Â N I A
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii
Minuta deciziei nr. 2 Dosar nr. 2969/1/2020
Şedinţa din 8 februarie 2021
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE: Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Avocatul Poporului şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că: În interpretarea şi aplicarea sintagmei „până la soluţionarea contestaţiei la executare” din cuprinsul art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, suspendarea executării silite este limitată în timp până la soluţionarea în primă instanţă a contestaţiei la executare. Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 8 februarie 2021.