Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_169585 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on complex merger of penalties in multiple post-execution recidivism and concurrence scenarios

Case Number ICCJ_169585
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Brăila Tribunal. The dispute concerned a procedural question in criminal law regarding the specific mechanism for merging penalties when a major defendant received three sentences after February 1, 2014, where the first sentence constituted the initial term of post-execution recidivism for the second, the second was in a state of post-execution recidivism with the first and in concurrence with the third, and the third covered an offense committed prior to the first becoming final. The court’s decision rests on the procedural requirements for admissibility of preliminary rulings under Article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, determining that the Tribunal’s specific factual inquiry did not meet the necessary legal criteria for a decisive judgment by the Supreme Court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on complex merger of penalties in multiple post-execution recidivism and concurrence scenarios: Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary decision code of criminal procedure preliminary ruling procedure sentencing the term 'judgment' power of decision
AI generated
ICCJ_156435
Admissibility of reference on penalty merging for offenses in intermediate plurality and concurrence
ICCJ_220719
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on systemic impunity, statutory interpretation of concurrence of criminal laws, and compatibility of secret statute interruption with criminal law foreseeability.
Decizia nr. 69/2020
Sequencing of penalty combination for concurrent offenses and post-execution recidivism under Article 79(2) of the Criminal Code
ICCJ_128525
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on temporal application of Penal Code to conditional release revocation and sentencing concurrence
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr.69 Dosar nr.2413/1/2020

Şedinţa din data de 3 noiembrie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Brăila, în dosarul nr. 2682/196/2020, prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„în ipoteza în care un inculpat major a fost condamnat după data de 01.02.2014 prin 3 sentinţe astfel:

- prima, în ordine cronologică, constituie primul termen al recidivei postexecutorii faţă de a doua sentinţă;

- a doua pedeapsă se află în stare de recidivă postexecutorie cu prima sentinţă şi în concurs cu cea de a treia sentinţă;

- a treia sentinţă, în ordine cronologică, cuprinzând o pedeapsă pentru o infracţiune care a fost săvârşită anterior rămânerii definitive a primei sentinţe şi un rest dintr-o măsură educativă.

Care este mecanismul de contopire a pedepselor ?”.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 3 noiembrie 2020.