Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_164897 AI generated

Admissibility of employer's action to declare a warning strike illegal filed after the strike's termination

Case Number ICCJ_164897
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, through its Panel for Resolving Questions of Law, dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference raised by the Court of Appeal of Iași concerning the labor law dispute. The procedural issue concerned whether an employer's action to declare a warning strike illegal was inadmissible if filed after the strike had already ended, with the question framed under Articles 198 and 200 of Law No. 62/2011 regarding social dialogue and Article 35 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Court did not provide a substantive legal interpretation of the labor law provisions, instead rejecting the referral on procedural grounds of inadmissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the case without a binding uniform interpretation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of employer's action to declare a warning strike illegal filed after the strike's termination: The procedural issue concerned whether an employer's action to declare a warning strike illegal was inadmissible if filed after the strike had already ended, with the question framed under Articles 198 and 200 of Law No. 62/2011 regarding social dialogue and Article 35 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Court did not provide a substantive legal interpretation of the labor law provisions, instead rejecting the referral on procedural grounds of inadmissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the case without a binding uniform interpretation.

Keywords

AI generated
strike article of civil procedure social dialogue grounds for cassation trade union rights termination of employment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Establishes the mandatory nature of the court's decision on the preliminary reference, cited in the dispositive to finalize the ruling on inadmissibility.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 58/2020
Admissibility of reference for preliminary decision on post-strike action for constating illegality of warning strike
Decizia nr. 1525/2018
Labor dismissal sanctions: Inadmissibility of appeal against clarification decision on non-reviewable final judgment
Decizia nr. 2814/2014
Labor dispute: inadmissibility of extraordinary appeal against final judgment in termination of employment contract
Decizia nr. 1199/2017
Employee’s challenge to partial annulment of disciplinary warning dismissed as inadmissible; appellate ruling upheld.
Decizia nr. 114/2025
Employee's appeal in labor dispute inadmissible; appellate ruling left intact

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Establishes the mandatory nature of the court's decision on the preliminary reference, cited in the dispositive to finalize the ruling on inadmissibility.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 58 Dosar nr. 1519/1/2020

Ședința din 28 septembrie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi – Secţia litigii de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 2069/89/2019, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

În interpretarea și aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 198 şi art. 200 din Legea dialogului social nr. 62/2011, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, cu referire la art. 35 din Codul de procedură civilă, acţiunea angajatorului în constatarea nelegalității grevei, în speță a grevei de avertisment, este inadmisibilă atunci când a fost introdusă după momentul încetării grevei?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 septembrie 2020.