Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_164895 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on collective agreement nullity standing inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_164895
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether the phrase "at the request of the interested party" in Article 142(2) of the Social Dialogue Law No. 62/2011 refers only to signatory parties of a collective labor agreement or to any employee seeking nullity in their own name. The Court ruled that the referral was inadmissible, leaving the underlying appeal pending. The decision was made in a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, based on the view that the legal question did not meet the admissibility criteria for such a referral.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 142 alin. (2) din Legea dialogului social nr. 62/2011, Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary ruling referral on collective agreement nullity standing inadmissible: 62/2011 refers only to signatory parties of a collective labor agreement or to any employee seeking nullity in their own name. The Court ruled that the referral was inadmissible, leaving the underlying appeal pending. The decision was made in a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, based on the view that the legal question did not meet the admissibility criteria for such a referral.

Keywords

AI generated
collective labor agreements preliminary ruling procedure nullity of agreements and decisions preliminary decision article of civil procedure standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (2) din Legea dialogului social nr. 62/2011
Provision whose interpretation was requested, but the referral was deemed inadmissible.
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Established the binding nature of the decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 56/2020
Standing of individual employees to challenge nullity of collective labor agreement clauses under Law 62/2011
Decizia nr. 58/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling referral on salary calculation under collective labor agreements for public sector staff
Decizia nr. 48/2018
Labor dispute preliminary ruling referral dismissed as inadmissible; appellate merits adjudication to proceed.
ICCJ_178528
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction under Article 521(3) Civil Procedure Code.
ICCJ_223196
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on calculation of public sector base salary and collective labor agreement application under 2022-2023 wage ordinances

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (2) din Legea dialogului social nr. 62/2011

Provision whose interpretation was requested, but the referral was deemed inadmissible.

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Established the binding nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 56 Dosar nr. 1434/1/2020

Ședința din 28 septembrie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 971/87/2018, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Interpretarea sintagmei „la cererea părţii interesate” din art. 142 alin. (2) din Legea dialogului social nr. 62/2011, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, respectiv dacă se referă numai la părțile semnatare ale contractului colectiv de muncă sau dacă oricare salariat poate cere constatarea nulității în nume personal.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 septembrie 2020.