Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_164749 AI generated

Inadmissibility of extra-legal appeal regarding tariff for public interest information in electronic format

Case Number ICCJ_164749
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the Administrative Council of the Court of Appeal, thereby upholding the lower court's position regarding the contested legal issue. The dispute concerned the procedural requirement for providing public interest information in electronic format, specifically challenging whether such communication should be provided free of charge or against a fee. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, leaving the challenged ruling in force without altering the underlying legal question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of extra-legal appeal regarding tariff for public interest information in electronic format: The dispute concerned the procedural requirement for providing public interest information in electronic format, specifically challenging whether such communication should be provided free of charge or against a fee. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, leaving the challenged ruling in force without altering the underlying legal question.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code e-justice tariff dispute procedural requirement administrative fee right of reply

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Basis for declaring the appeal in the interest of the law inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2073/2024
Public information request appeal inadmissible under finality bar
Decizia nr. 2550/2021
Inadmissibility of appeal against final appellate judgment in public information access dispute
Decizia nr. 5247/2013
Inadmissibility of appeal against jurisdictional declination under access-to-public-information law
Decizia nr. 465/2006
Appeal against final ruling on denied public information access quashed as inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 30/2022
Public information access dispute; inadmissibility of appeal against suspension order due to lack of legal interest after proceedings resumed.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Basis for declaring the appeal in the interest of the law inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul competent să judece recursul în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 19 Dosar nr. 1372/1/2020

Şedinţa de la 14 septembrie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E : Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Braşov cu privire la următoarea problemă: „Comunicarea informaţiilor de interes public în format electronic se realizează contra cost sau gratuit ?”. Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunţată, în şedinţă publică, astăzi 14 septembrie 2020.