Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_158163 AI generated

Eligibility for veterinary and food safety hazard supplements under Law No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_158163
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal regarding the interpretation and application of specific wage supplement provisions. The dispute concerned the eligibility of personnel in public veterinary and food safety institutions for a hazard bonus of up to 35% under Law No. 153/2017, specifically questioning the intersection of Annex VIII, Chapter II, item 6.2(a)(1) with Article 38 of the same law. The court's decision was based on the procedural requirement that a reference for a preliminary ruling on questions of law must be admissible under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in the rejection of the request without a substantive ruling on the interpretation of the wage supplement norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Eligibility for veterinary and food safety hazard supplements under Law No. 153/2017: The dispute concerned the eligibility of personnel in public veterinary and food safety institutions for a hazard bonus of up to 35% under Law No. 153/2017, specifically questioning the intersection of Annex VIII, Chapter II, item 6.2(a)(1) with Article 38 of the same law. The court's decision was based on the procedural requirement that a reference for a preliminary ruling on questions of law must be admissible under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in the rejection of the request without a substantive ruling on the interpretation of the wage supplement norms.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling food safety food supplements wage supplement procedural requirement interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the mandatory procedural basis governing the decision to reject the preliminary reference as inadmissible.
AI generated
ICCJ_156419
Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on 15% disability salary supplement under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 751/2018
Decizia nr. 37/2020
Veterinary and food safety surcharge: inadmissible reference due to lack of legal difficulty and established jurisprudence on phased salary application
Decizia nr. 410/2020
Appeal against revision of veterinary and food safety decision declared inadmissible as final.
ICCJ_226584
Admissibility of referrals on whether public food allowances are subject to salary caps under Framework Law 153/2017
ICCJ_228078
Admissibility of preliminary reference on eligibility conditions for PNNR-related salary supplements under Law no. 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the mandatory procedural basis governing the decision to reject the preliminary reference as inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 37 Dosar nr. 291/1/2020

Şedinţa din 7 mai 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia a IX-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

<<Cum se interpretează şi aplică dispozițiile Anexei VIII, cap. II, lit. A, pct. II, subpct. 6.2 lit. a), pct. 1 din Legea nr. 153/2017, modificată şi completată, care prevăd că „Personalul din instituțiile publice sanitare veterinare şi pentru siguranța alimentelor care este încadrat și își desfășoară activitatea în specialitatea funcțiilor specifice prevăzute în prezenta anexă beneficiază și de următoarele categorii de sporuri şi drepturi: a) Sporuri: 1. Spor pentru condiții deosebite de muncă vătămătoare/periculoase care implică risc de îmbolnăvire şi/sau contagiune directă sau indirectă, respectiv riscuri asociate datorate condițiilor specifice de desfășurare a activității - de până la 35%; (…)” în corelare cu dispozițiile art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017, modificată și completată?>>.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 7 mai 2020.