Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_157835 AI generated

Limitation Period for Property Reconstitution Claims Under Law No. 18/1991

Case Number ICCJ_157835
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its specialized panel for resolving questions of law, admitted the reference from the Maramureș District Court and ruled that a specific legal interpretation is mandatory for all future similar cases. The dispute concerned whether a request for the reconstitution of property rights based on specific restitutive provisions of the Land Fund Law is subject to a statutory limitation period. The Court established that a claim for property reconstitution filed under Article 11(21) in conjunction with Article 27(21) of Law No. 18/1991 is indeed subject to the limitation period prescribed by Article 11(4) of the same Law, thereby clarifying the temporal validity of such restitutive claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea nr. 18/1991, art. 11 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 18/1991, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Limitation Period for Property Reconstitution Claims Under Law No. 18/1991: The dispute concerned whether a request for the reconstitution of property rights based on specific restitutive provisions of the Land Fund Law is subject to a statutory limitation period. The Court established that a claim for property reconstitution filed under Article 11(21) in conjunction with Article 27(21) of Law No. 18/1991 is indeed subject to the limitation period prescribed by Article 11(4) of the same Law, thereby clarifying the temporal validity of such restitutive claims.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation periods right to property restitution of expropriated property interpretation of the law attachment of real property length of lease

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea nr. 18/1991
(21) coroborate cu art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea nr. 18/1991 este supusă termenului prevăzut de art.
art. 11 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 18/1991
Provision determining the limitation period to which the cited claims are subject, forming the core of the court's operative decision.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision establishing that the interpretation is mandatory for all courts.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 36/2020
Land law reconstitution: applicability of filing deadlines to claims based on "return by right" of abusively taken properties
ICCJ_83517
Statutory limitation period for compensation claims arising from the natural restitution of privatized real estate to former owners
Decizia nr. 4892/2006
Reinstatement of nationalized property: applicability of general limitation period versus 30-day statutory deadline for public institution disputes
Decizia nr. 1889/2023
Expiry of the action for compensation for defective property valuation: start of the limitation period upon issuance of the restitution decision
Decizia nr. 2436/2023
State property restitution: Limitation period for damage claims arising from overvalued real estate begins at compensation decision, not later notification.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 11 alin. (21) coroborate cu art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991

Substantive legal provisions defining the specific type of reconstitution claim analyzed in the final ruling.

art. 11 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 18/1991

Provision determining the limitation period to which the cited claims are subject, forming the core of the court's operative decision.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision establishing that the interpretation is mandatory for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.36 Dosar nr. 434/1/2020

Şedinţa din 4 mai 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Maramureş - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 7581/182/2017, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile.

În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 11 alin. (21) coroborate cu art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, stabileşte că:

Formularea cererii de reconstituire a dreptului de proprietate întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 11 alin. (21) coroborate cu art. 27 alin. (21) din Legea nr. 18/1991 este supusă termenului prevăzut de art. 11 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 18/1991.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 4 mai 2020.