Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_156419 AI generated

Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on 15% disability salary supplement under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 751/2018

Case Number ICCJ_156419
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its Full Court for the resolution of legal issues, dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Brașov Court of Appeal, thereby preventing the issuance of a binding interpretative decision and leaving the lower court's proceedings unaffected regarding the legal question at hand. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of the 15% salary supplement for persons with disabilities under specific government regulations, with the referring court seeking clarification on how this provision interacts with the framework salary law for public-sector employees. The Court's decision was grounded in procedural admissibility standards under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, focusing on the formal requirements for initiating a preliminary reference regarding the interpretation of Article 22(2) of Law No. 153/2017 and Government Decision No. 751/2018, rather than addressing the substantive rights of the plaintiffs in the underlying administrative-tax litigation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on 15% disability salary supplement under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 751/2018: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of the 15% salary supplement for persons with disabilities under specific government regulations, with the referring court seeking clarification on how this provision interacts with the framework salary law for public-sector employees. The Court's decision was grounded in procedural admissibility standards under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, focusing on the formal requirements for initiating a preliminary reference regarding the interpretation of Article 22(2) of Law No. 153/2017 and Government Decision No. 751/2018, rather than addressing the substantive rights of the plaintiffs in the underlying administrative-tax litigation.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary decision Civil Procedure Code procedural requirement grounds for cassation framework decision tax on salaries

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017
751/2018 pentru stabilirea categoriilor de persoane cu handicap care beneficiază de un spor de 15% din salariul de bază/solda de funcţie/salariul de funcţie/indemnizaţia de încadrare, în coroborare cu prevederile art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017 ?”
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is obligatory for the referring court following the dismissal of the preliminary reference.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 24/2020
Eligibility for disability salary surcharge under phased salary framework and validity of preliminary ruling referral
ICCJ_222082
Inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling on salary calculation for public employees following statutory transformation of contractual posts
ICCJ_228078
Admissibility of preliminary reference on eligibility conditions for PNNR-related salary supplements under Law no. 153/2017
ICCJ_230721
Preliminary reference on public sector salary equality under Framework Law 153/2017 dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_230277
Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on the permanent versus temporary character of conditional 50% salary supplements

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is obligatory for the referring court following the dismissal of the preliminary reference.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 24 Dosar nr. 3348/1/2019

Şedinţa din 2 martie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Brașov – Secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 1374/62/2019, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Cum se interpretează şi aplică dispoziţiile art. 22 alin. (2) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, şi Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 751/2018 pentru stabilirea categoriilor de persoane cu handicap care beneficiază de un spor de 15% din salariul de bază/solda de funcţie/salariul de funcţie/indemnizaţia de încadrare, în coroborare cu prevederile art. 38 din Legea nr. 153/2017 ?”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din 2 martie 2020.