Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_155563 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on assimilation of daily operational assignment to formal delegation of managerial authority in penitentiary administration

Case Number ICCJ_155563
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without a supreme court interpretation. The dispute involved a procedural challenge regarding the interpretation of Article 55(3) of Law No. 293/2004 concerning the Status of Public Officials with Special Status in the Penitentiary Administration, specifically whether a daily unit decision assigning specific managerial duties could be legally assimilated to a formal delegation of authority for a managerial function as required by the statute. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, meaning no substantive ruling on the specific statutory interpretation was issued.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 55 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 293/2004, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling on assimilation of daily operational assignment to formal delegation of managerial authority in penitentiary administration: The dispute involved a procedural challenge regarding the interpretation of Article 55(3) of Law No. 293/2004 concerning the Status of Public Officials with Special Status in the Penitentiary Administration, specifically whether a daily unit decision assigning specific managerial duties could be legally assimilated to a formal delegation of authority for a managerial function as required by the statute. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, meaning no substantive ruling on the specific statutory interpretation was issued.

Keywords

AI generated
administration of justice preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure procedural issues statutory assignment legal status

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 55 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 293/2004
„Dispozițiile art. 55 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision dismissing the inadmissible request for a preliminary ruling.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 10/2020
Referral for preliminary ruling on prison staff salary for duties performed via daily orders deemed inadmissible for lack of novelty
ICCJ_230787
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on interplay between administrative procedural competence and civil standing provisions
Decizia nr. 405/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on maximum salary calculation for special-status penitentiary civil servants
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts
Decizia nr. 1786/2008
Jurisdictional competence over prisoner transfer orders: exclusive delegation to the executing judge vs. administrative litigation admissibility.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision dismissing the inadmissible request for a preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 2957/1/2019

Şedinţa din 10 februarie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanța – Secția a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ și fiscal, în dosarul nr. 3369/118/2018, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Dispozițiile art. 55 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 293/2004 privind Statutul funcționarilor publici cu statut special din Administrația Națională a Penitenciarelor, republicată, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, pot fi interpretate în sensul asimilării deciziei zilnice pe unitate prin care se dispune îndeplinirea atribuțiilor specifice unei funcții de conducere cu împuternicirea în funcția de conducere prevăzută de lege ?”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din 10 februarie 2020.