Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_155120 AI generated

Insurance machinery-use referral inadmissible; no merits ruling.

Case Number ICCJ_155120
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a referral from the Bacău Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 27 point 11 of Norm No. 23/2014 on mandatory motor vehicle liability insurance, specifically whether the phrase "when these are used as working machinery or installations" refers to devices mounted on the vehicle itself or to the vehicle as a whole when used as such. The court found the referral inadmissible, meaning the lower court's question was not answered on the merits. The decision was rendered in a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which makes the ruling binding, and the court did not order any other relief or determine the underlying dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance machinery-use referral inadmissible; no merits ruling: 23/2014 on mandatory motor vehicle liability insurance, specifically whether the phrase "when these are used as working machinery or installations" refers to devices mounted on the vehicle itself or to the vehicle as a whole when used as such. The court found the referral inadmissible, meaning the lower court's question was not answered on the merits. The decision was rendered in a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which makes the ruling binding, and the court did not order any other relief or determine the underlying dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
motor vehicle liability insurance referral order preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision article of civil procedure scope of applicable law
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1040/2022
Inadmissibility of cassation appeal in motor liability insurance dispute under exclusive appellate jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 6/2020
Insurance exclusion for snowplow-attached truck damage deemed clear; referral inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 573/2024
Inadmissibility of cassation in insurance liability disputes following statutory elimination of extraordinary appeal
Decizia nr. 1986/2022
Inadmissibility of cassation appeal in insurance matters due to statutory exclusion of appellate finality
Decizia nr. 1310/2023
Inadmissibility of cassation appeal in insurance liability dispute due to statutory exclusion from extraordinary remedies

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 6 Dosar nr. 2709/1/2019

Şedinţa din 20 ianuarie 2020

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bacău – Secția I civilă, în dosarul nr. 2024/270/2016, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

<<Sintagma „atunci când acestea sunt utilizate ca utilaje ori instalații de lucru” din cuprinsul dispozițiilor art. 27 pct. 11 din Norma nr. 23/2014 privind asigurarea obligatorie de răspundere civilă pentru prejudicii produse prin accidente de vehicule, emisă de Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se referă la ipoteza utilizării dispozitivelor sau instalațiilor montate pe autovehicul în sine ca utilaje sau instalații de lucru sau se referă la ipoteza utilizării autovehiculului pe care sunt montate acestea ca utilaj sau instalație de lucru în ansamblul său ?>>

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 20 ianuarie 2020.