Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 719/2019 AI generated

Venue-change order immune from appeal; revision request inadmissible, prior order final.

Case Number Decizia nr. 719/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request for revision (revizuire) filed against its own 2014 order rejecting a motion to change venue (strămutare) in a civil case; the revision was rejected, and the prior order remains in force. The movant, an association acting through its founding president, sought to challenge the 2014 interlocutory order via the extraordinary retractive remedy of revision. The court held that under Article 40(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, a decision on a venue-change request is subject to no appeal whatsoever, which necessarily excludes the retractive remedy of revision; therefore, the revision request was barred as inadmissible, and the decision was declared final (irevocabilă).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Venue-change order immune from appeal; revision request inadmissible, prior order final: The movant, an association acting through its founding president, sought to challenge the 2014 interlocutory order via the extraordinary retractive remedy of revision. The court held that under Article 40(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, a decision on a venue-change request is subject to no appeal whatsoever, which necessarily excludes the retractive remedy of revision; therefore, the revision request was barred as inadmissible, and the decision was declared final (irevocabilă).

Keywords

AI generated
article of civil procedure interlocutory decision extraordinary revision excluded cases revision of asylum decision change of precedent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ
Basis for rejecting the application for reconsideration (revizuire) as inadmissible, since a decision on a request for transfer of proceedings is not subject to any appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3781/2011
Revision of venue-change order inadmissible; prior denial stands
Decizia nr. 2491/2011
Venue-transfer order final; revision deemed inadmissible as no appeal lies.
Decizia nr. 861/2023
Venue-transfer appeal inadmissible; original order stands as final under Article 40(4).
Decizia nr. 260/2015
Venue-change denial final after perempted extraordinary appeal
Decizia nr. 149/2023
Inadmissibility of appeal against final venue-change order under Civil Procedure Code art. 40(4)

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Basis for rejecting the application for reconsideration (revizuire) as inadmissible, since a decision on a request for transfer of proceedings is not subject to any appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cauzei de faţă, constată următoarele:

Prin Încheierea nr. 1477 din 16 mai 2014, Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia I civilă, a respins cererea formulată de petentul A. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. x/2012 al Judecătoriei sector 4 Bucureşti.

Împotriva acestei încheieri a formulat cerere de revizuire Asociaţia pentru Cinstirea Memoriei Eroilor, prin Preşedinte fondator A..

La termenul de astăzi, 4 aprilie 2019, Înalta Curte a rămas în pronunţare asupra inadmisibilităţii cererii de revizuire în raport de dispoziţiile art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Conform textului de lege sus-menţionat, hotărârea dată asupra cererii de strămutare nu este supusă niciunei căi de atac, în consecinţă, nici căii de atac de retractare a revizuirii.

Raportat la aceste argumente, Înalta Curte urmează să respingă cererea de revizuire ca inadmisibilă, partea neavând deschisă calea de atac pe care a exercitat-o împotriva încheierii pronunţate într-o cerere de strămutare.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, cererea de revizuire formulată de revizuenta Asociaţia pentru Cinstirea Memoriei Eroilor, prin Preşedinte fondator A., împotriva Încheierii nr. 1477 din şedinţa camerei de consiliu de la 16 mai 2014, pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. x/2014.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 4 aprilie 2019.

Procesat de GGC - CL