Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_153559 AI generated

Scope of contraventional authority to order regularization of unauthorized constructions and compatibility with territorial planning law

Case Number ICCJ_153559
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the reference for a preliminary ruling submitted by a lower civil court. The dispute concerned a contraventional sanction case involving the interpretation of construction law, specifically questioning whether an administrative authority imposing such a sanction had the power to order the regularization and preservation of unauthorized constructions, and the compatibility of these powers with territorial planning provisions. The decisive legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 28(1) and (2) in correlation with Article 32 of Law No. 50/1991 regarding the authorization of construction works, read in conjunction with Article 561 of Law No. 350/2001 concerning territorial planning and urbanism.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 32 din Legea nr. 50/1991, art. 561 din Legea nr. 350/2001, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of contraventional authority to order regularization of unauthorized constructions and compatibility with territorial planning law: The dispute concerned a contraventional sanction case involving the interpretation of construction law, specifically questioning whether an administrative authority imposing such a sanction had the power to order the regularization and preservation of unauthorized constructions, and the compatibility of these powers with territorial planning provisions. The decisive legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 28(1) and (2) in correlation with Article 32 of Law No. 50/1991 regarding the authorization of construction works, read in conjunction with Article 561 of Law No. 350/2001 concerning territorial planning and urbanism.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative authority unauthorized construction territorial scope administrative sanction territorial law reference for a preliminary ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 32 din Legea nr. 50/1991
(1) şi (2) coroborat cu art. 32 din Legea nr.
art. 561 din Legea nr. 350/2001
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision rejecting the reference for a preliminary ruling is obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1087/2017
Unlawful construction enforcement under Law No. 50/1991: scope of subsequent permit covering only minor works and validity of building erected in excess of authorized height and footprint
Decizia nr. 556/2007
Legality of administrative order excluding warning sanction for unauthorized construction under Law 50/1991
ICCJ_134779
Admissibility of preliminary referral on conflicting interpretation of building regularization document requirements under Law 50/1991
ICCJ_217297
Scope of continuing construction after stoppage order: offense under Law 50/1991 excludes orders issued by criminal prosecution authorities
Decizia nr. 2176/2006
Legality of delegating construction permit issuance and sanctioning powers to county councils in violation of local authority competencies

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision rejecting the reference for a preliminary ruling is obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 53 Dosar nr. 1793/1/2019

Şedinţa din 11 noiembrie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Cluj - Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 7486/211/2018, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile vizând interpretarea prevederilor art. 28 alin. (1) şi (2) coroborat cu art. 32 din Legea nr. 50/1991 privind autorizarea executării lucrărilor de construcţii, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, referitor la posibilitatea organului care a aplicat sancţiunea contravenţională de a dispune intrarea în legalitate şi menţinerea construcţiilor realizate fără autorizaţie de construire şi dacă sunt compatibile cu dispoziţiile art. 561 din Legea nr. 350/2001 privind amenajarea teritoriului şi urbanismul, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, şi cum se interpretează dispoziţiile art. 561 din Legea nr. 350/2001 raportate la prevederile art. 28 alin. (1) şi (2) şi ale art. 32 din Legea nr. 50/1991.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 11 noiembrie 2019.