Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_153017 AI generated

Admissibility of Preliminary Ruling on Cure of Absolute Nullity in Mandated Civil Pleading

Case Number ICCJ_153017
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the request for a preliminary ruling as inadmissible, leaving the lower tribunal's proceedings unaffected. The dispute concerned a civil procedural issue where a lower court sought clarification on whether the absolute nullity resulting from a legal entity acting as a mandary for another legal entity in drafting a statement of claim could be cured by subsequent actions. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the procedural requirement that the submitted legal question did not meet the statutory criteria for admission under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning the mechanism for resolving legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of Preliminary Ruling on Cure of Absolute Nullity in Mandated Civil Pleading: The dispute concerned a civil procedural issue where a lower court sought clarification on whether the absolute nullity resulting from a legal entity acting as a mandary for another legal entity in drafting a statement of claim could be cured by subsequent actions. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the procedural requirement that the submitted legal question did not meet the statutory criteria for admission under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning the mechanism for resolving legal questions.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code procedural nullity preliminary ruling procedure preliminary proceedings statement of claim statutory requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision rejecting the preliminary ruling.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision rejecting the preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 40 Dosar nr. 128/1/2019

Ședința din 14 octombrie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Dolj - Secţia contencios administrativ și fiscal în dosarul nr. 282/215/2016*, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept: „interpretarea dispozițiilor art. 82 alin. (1) raportat la art. 84 alin. (1) şi (2) din Codul de procedură civilă, în sensul de a indica dacă este posibilă acoperirea nulității absolute rezultând din redactarea cererii de chemare în judecată de o persoană juridică, în calitate de mandatar al altei persoane juridice”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 14 octombrie 2019.