Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_153016 AI generated

Ex lege classification of anatomy and pathology staff as special conditions workplaces without administrative methodology under Law No. 104/2003

Case Number ICCJ_153016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the public interest filed by the Ombudsman, thereby establishing a binding unitary interpretation that mandates the ex lege classification of specific workplace categories. The dispute concerned whether positions held by personnel in hospital pathology services, prosection rooms, and university departments of anatomy, histology, and cellular biology must be classified as "workplaces under special conditions" through the administrative methodology prescribed by Government Orders No. 261/2001 and No. 246/2007, or if such classification is automatic. Relying on Article 22 of Law No. 104/2003 regarding the manipulation of human corpses and organ retrieval for transplantation, the court ruled that these roles are ex lege classified as special conditions workplaces, rendering the procedural steps for methodology-based classification unnecessary and obsolete for these specific positions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 22 din Legea nr. 104/2003, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Ex lege classification of anatomy and pathology staff as special conditions workplaces without administrative methodology under Law No. 104/2003: The dispute concerned whether positions held by personnel in hospital pathology services, prosection rooms, and university departments of anatomy, histology, and cellular biology must be classified as "workplaces under special conditions" through the administrative methodology prescribed by Government Orders No. 261/2001 and No. 246/2007, or if such classification is automatic. Relying on Article 22 of Law No. 104/2003 regarding the manipulation of human corpses and organ retrieval for transplantation, the court ruled that these roles are ex lege classified as special conditions workplaces, rendering the procedural steps for methodology-based classification unnecessary and obsolete for these specific positions.

Keywords

AI generated
university hospitals administrative personnel interpretation of the law procedural orders workplace regulations action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 22 din Legea nr. 104/2003
Substantive basis for the unitary interpretation that specific medical and academic positions are ex lege classified as workplaces under special conditions.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis establishing the mandatory nature of the decision in the appeal in the public interest.
AI generated
ICCJ_154530
Pathology and autopsy staff jobs classified ex lege as special working conditions; appeal admitted.
Decizia nr. 4771/2020
Ex lege classification of pathology staff work positions in special working conditions and inapplicability of administrative renewal procedure
Decizia nr. 971/2022
Discrimination from differential classification into special working conditions: no administrative duty to classify labor categories ex officio absent employer request
ICCJ_131545
Judicial refusal to certify or compel classification of workplaces under severe or special conditions absent statutory administrative approvals and legislative listings.
Decizia nr. 1492/2008
Classification of underground subway dispatch and commercial roles as special conditions work: validity of administrative refusal based on "exploitative activity" under Government Order No. 1025/2003

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 22 din Legea nr. 104/2003

Substantive basis for the unitary interpretation that specific medical and academic positions are ex lege classified as workplaces under special conditions.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis establishing the mandatory nature of the decision in the appeal in the public interest.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 24 Dosar nr. 1460/1/2019

Şedinţa de la 14 octombrie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E : Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Avocatul Poporului şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că: În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 22 din Legea nr. 104/2003 privind manipularea cadavrelor umane şi prelevarea organelor şi ţesuturilor de la cadavre în vederea transplantului, republicată, locurile de muncă ale personalului care desfăşoară activitatea în serviciile de anatomie patologică şi prosecturi ale spitalelor, precum şi personalul disciplinelor universitare de anatomie, de histologie, de anatomie patologică şi al catedrei de biologie celulară sunt încadrate ex lege în categoria locurilor de muncă în condiţii deosebite, fără a fi necesară parcurgerea metodologiei prevăzute de Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 261/2001 privind criteriile şi metodologia de încadrare a locurilor de muncă în condiţii deosebite, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare şi, respectiv, de Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 246/2007 privind metodologia de reînnoire a avizelor de încadrare a locurilor de muncă în condiţii deosebite, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în ceea ce priveşte criteriile şi metodologia de încadrare a locurilor de muncă în condiţii deosebite.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 14 octombrie 2019.