Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_150116 AI generated

Statute of limitations for civil compensation claims against military personnel under Government Ordinance 121/1998

Case Number ICCJ_150116
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral filed by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby preventing the establishment of a preliminary ruling on the specific legal question. The dispute concerned the applicable statute of limitations for the enforcement of civil compensation claims established in favor of public authorities against military personnel, arising from civil actions processed within criminal proceedings under Government Ordinance No. 121/1998 regarding material responsibility of military personnel. The court's decision rests on procedural admissibility criteria, specifically interpreting the requirements for the referral of a legal question under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that such referrals be handled in a mandatory manner when specific conditions are met, but here found the referral insufficient to meet the threshold for a binding preliminary ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Statute of limitations for civil compensation claims against military personnel under Government Ordinance 121/1998: The dispute concerned the applicable statute of limitations for the enforcement of civil compensation claims established in favor of public authorities against military personnel, arising from civil actions processed within criminal proceedings under Government Ordinance No. 121/1998 regarding material responsibility of military personnel. The court's decision rests on procedural admissibility criteria, specifically interpreting the requirements for the referral of a legal question under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that such referrals be handled in a mandatory manner when specific conditions are met, but here found the referral insufficient to meet the threshold for a binding preliminary ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations military personnel article of civil procedure enforcement proceedings procedural limitations preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis requiring the referral to be obligatory, which the court applied in determining the admissibility of the preliminary ruling request.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4751/2024
Statute of limitations for compensation claims following refusal to issue military rank classification act; accrual date tied to definitive judicial confirmation of illegality
Decizia nr. 4171/2007
Statutory limitation period for challenging military disciplinary council decisions under administrative jurisdiction law
Decizia nr. 1650/2019
Military Material Liability: Timeliness of Administrative Investigation Restoration and Statute of Limitations for Loss Constation
Decizia nr. 4908/2009
Statute of limitations for pre-litigation administrative complaint in military rank and pension dispute
Decizia nr. 6028/2010
Military service injury claim extinguished by statute of limitations under Decree No. 167/1958

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis requiring the referral to be obligatory, which the court applied in determining the admissibility of the preliminary ruling request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 32 Dosar nr. 874/1/2019

Şedinţa din 24 iunie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a IV-a civilă în dosarul nr. 13721/302/2017 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile referitoare la următoarea chestiune de drept: „Care este termenul de prescripție a dreptului de a obține executarea silită aplicabil creanțelor stabilite în favoarea autorităților publice cu titlu de despăgubiri civile datorate de cadrele militare în temeiul Ordonanței Guvernului nr. 121/1998 privind răspunderea materială a militarilor, ca urmare a soluționării acțiunii civile în cadrul unui proces penal?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 24 iunie 2019.