Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_149454 AI generated

Inadmissibility of referral for uniform interpretation on duration of enforcement suspension pending objection to enforcement

Case Number ICCJ_149454
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Timiș Tribunal, leaving the lower court’s procedural position unchanged without a substantive decision on the legal question. The dispute arose from a need to interpret Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically concerning the exact duration for which enforcement proceedings must be suspended and the precise meaning of the phrase "until the ruling on the objection to enforcement" is delivered. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement that such referrals for uniform interpretation of the law must meet admissibility criteria; by rejecting the referral as inadmissible, the Supreme Court declined to issue the binding interpretation requested by the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Inadmissibility of referral for uniform interpretation on duration of enforcement suspension pending objection to enforcement: The dispute arose from a need to interpret Article 719(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically concerning the exact duration for which enforcement proceedings must be suspended and the precise meaning of the phrase "until the ruling on the objection to enforcement" is delivered. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement that such referrals for uniform interpretation of the law must meet admissibility criteria; by rejecting the referral as inadmissible, the Supreme Court declined to issue the binding interpretation requested by the lower court.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code enforcement decision procedural preliminary objections preliminary ruling procedure uniform interpretation pending proceedings
AI generated
ICCJ_202032
Admissibility of a referral for interpretation on repeated enforcement of late penalties and the priority of res judicata over Supreme Court legal interpretations
ICCJ_205567
Court rules enforcement limitation referral inadmissible under Article 705(1) CPC.
ICCJ_192652
Inadmissible preliminary ruling on whether unconstitutionality of contravention norms terminates execution of imposed sanctions
Decizia nr. 6732/2010
Appeal against refusal to suspend enforcement proceedings held inadmissible
Decizia nr. 260/2014
Appeal against irrevocable appellate order on enforcement suspension deemed inadmissible

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 27 Dosar nr. 582/1/2019

Ședința din 3 iunie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile formulată de Tribunalul Timiş - Secţia a II-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 24477/325/2017, cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept:

Cum se interpretează şi/sau se aplică prevederile art. 719 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă în ceea ce priveşte momentul până la care se dispune suspendarea executării silite, respectiv care este înţelesul sintagmei „până la soluţionarea contestaţiei la executare” din acest text de lege?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 3 iunie 2019.