Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_149451 AI generated

Pension recalculation referral inadmissible for unpaid magistrates' service pensions

Case Number ICCJ_149451
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling on the applicability of Article 107(3) of Law No. 263/2010 concerning the recalculation of pensions by adding income, as it relates to magistrates' service pensions not yet paid. The referral came from the Craiova Court of Appeal in a civil case, and the Court ruled the request inadmissible, meaning no substantive decision was issued on the legal question. The dispute involved whether the pension recalculation provision applies to service pensions for magistrates that have not been put into payment. The Court based its decision on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, finding the referral did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 107 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension recalculation referral inadmissible for unpaid magistrates' service pensions: 263/2010 concerning the recalculation of pensions by adding income, as it relates to magistrates' service pensions not yet paid. The referral came from the Craiova Court of Appeal in a civil case, and the Court ruled the request inadmissible, meaning no substantive decision was issued on the legal question. The dispute involved whether the pension recalculation provision applies to service pensions for magistrates that have not been put into payment. The Court based its decision on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, finding the referral did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
recalculation of pension procedural issues means of payment preliminary ruling procedure grounds for cassation preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 107 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 263/2010
10382/63/2017, cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept: „aplicabilitatea dispozițiilor art. 107 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Used to declare the referral binding.
AI generated
ICCJ_220714
Service pension recalculation referral held inadmissible for lacking statutory preconditions
Decizia nr. 81/2018
Referral on pension recalculation contribution periods dismissed as inadmissible due to prior binding ruling.
ICCJ_220638
Service-pension recalculation referrals inadmissible; merits unresolved
ICCJ_220664
Pension recalculation for special conditions allowed; referral on 2022 limits ruled inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 409/2025
Service pension recalculation claim under Law No. 282/2023: preliminary ruling referral declared inadmissible for lack of genuine legal difficulty

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Used to declare the referral binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.24 Dosar nr. 40/1/2019

Ședința din 3 iunie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea privind pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile formulată de Curtea de Apel Craiova - Secția I civilă, în dosarul nr. 10382/63/2017, cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept: „aplicabilitatea dispozițiilor art. 107 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, teza referitoare la recalcularea pensiei prin adăugarea veniturilor, în ceea ce privește pensiile de serviciu ale magistraților, nepuse în plată."

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 3 iunie 2019.