Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_149430 AI generated

Updated price claim for land sold under subsequently annulled title and interpretation of "successive sales" under Land Fund Law

Case Number ICCJ_149430
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania (Inalta Curte de Casație și Justiție) rejected as inadmissible the reference for the uniformity of law submitted by the Gorj County Court, thereby leaving the lower court's procedural posture unchanged. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article III(24) of Law No. 169/1997, which amends the Land Fund Law No. 18/1991, specifically regarding the conditions under which the updated price of land sold via a subsequently declared null title could be claimed through "successive land sales." The Court determined that the referral was inadmissible without engaging in substantive analysis of the specific legal question. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the requirement for a valid reference mechanism under the Civil Procedure Code, which was not met by the submitting court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Updated price claim for land sold under subsequently annulled title and interpretation of "successive sales" under Land Fund Law: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article III(24) of Law No. 169/1997, which amends the Land Fund Law No. 18/1991, specifically regarding the conditions under which the updated price of land sold via a subsequently declared null title could be claimed through "successive land sales." The Court determined that the referral was inadmissible without engaging in substantive analysis of the specific legal question. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the requirement for a valid reference mechanism under the Civil Procedure Code, which was not met by the submitting court.

Keywords

AI generated
land law price of land civil judgment interpretation of the law valuation proceedings restitution of expropriated property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is mandatory.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.22 Dosar nr. 129/1/2019

Şedinţa din 20 mai 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Gorj - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 9804/318/2014*, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: modul de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. III alin. (24) din Legea nr. 169/1997 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, privind cerinţele concrete în care poate fi solicitat şi obţinut preţul actualizat al unui teren vândut în baza unui titlu constatat nul ulterior vânzării, prin explicitarea sintagmelor „vânzări succesive ale terenurilor” şi „preţul actualizat”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 20 mai 2019.