Updated price claim for land sold under subsequently annulled title and interpretation of "successive sales" under Land Fund Law
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Romania (Inalta Curte de Casație și Justiție) rejected as inadmissible the reference for the uniformity of law submitted by the Gorj County Court, thereby leaving the lower court's procedural posture unchanged. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article III(24) of Law No. 169/1997, which amends the Land Fund Law No. 18/1991, specifically regarding the conditions under which the updated price of land sold via a subsequently declared null title could be claimed through "successive land sales." The Court determined that the referral was inadmissible without engaging in substantive analysis of the specific legal question. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the requirement for a valid reference mechanism under the Civil Procedure Code, which was not met by the submitting court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Updated price claim for land sold under subsequently annulled title and interpretation of "successive sales" under Land Fund Law: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article III(24) of Law No. 169/1997, which amends the Land Fund Law No. 18/1991, specifically regarding the conditions under which the updated price of land sold via a subsequently declared null title could be claimed through "successive land sales." The Court determined that the referral was inadmissible without engaging in substantive analysis of the specific legal question. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the requirement for a valid reference mechanism under the Civil Procedure Code, which was not met by the submitting court.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is mandatory.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.22 Dosar nr. 129/1/2019
Şedinţa din 20 mai 2019
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Gorj - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 9804/318/2014*, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: modul de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. III alin. (24) din Legea nr. 169/1997 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, privind cerinţele concrete în care poate fi solicitat şi obţinut preţul actualizat al unui teren vândut în baza unui titlu constatat nul ulterior vânzării, prin explicitarea sintagmelor „vânzări succesive ale terenurilor” şi „preţul actualizat”.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 20 mai 2019.