Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_149428 AI generated

Scope of suspension of public sector retirement aids after repeal by Framework Law No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_149428
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the preliminary ruling request submitted by the Cluj Court of Appeal regarding labor and social security litigation. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Article 11(1) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 90/2017, as amended by Law No. 80/2018, in conjunction with Article 44 of Framework Law No. 153/2017 on the salarization of public employees. Specifically, the referring court sought clarification on the legal status of aids and indemnities upon retirement, resignation, termination of service, or transfer to reserve after July 1, 2017, the date when such rights were repealed by the framework law. The High Court found the session for resolving this specific issue of law inadmissible, thereby leaving the procedural resolution of the underlying case to the lower court without a definitive interpretation from the supreme jurisdiction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of suspension of public sector retirement aids after repeal by Framework Law No. 153/2017: The dispute centered on the interpretation of Article 11(1) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 90/2017, as amended by Law No. 80/2018, in conjunction with Article 44 of Framework Law No. 153/2017 on the salarization of public employees. Specifically, the referring court sought clarification on the legal status of aids and indemnities upon retirement, resignation, termination of service, or transfer to reserve after July 1, 2017, the date when such rights were repealed by the framework law. The High Court found the session for resolving this specific issue of law inadmissible, thereby leaving the procedural resolution of the underlying case to the lower court without a definitive interpretation from the supreme jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
retirement social security termination of service suspension of disability pension legal reserve public sector

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the court's decision, cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 9/2018
Suspension versus extinction of public sector exit allowances under annual budgetary laws
Decizia nr. 72/2026
Pension suspension during continued public service: retroactive reinstatement vs. termination of civil service by pension decision
Decizia nr. 2456/2006
Appeal against pension termination for invalidity dismissed, upholding automatic cessation of public service.
ICCJ_121228
Suspended versus abrogated: Interpretation of the 2010 fiscal law's suspension of public sector retirement aid
ICCJ_220666
Automatic termination of public service upon pension issuance despite requested pension payment suspension

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the court's decision, cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.20 Dosar nr. 227/1/2019

Şedinţa din 20 mai 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea privind pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile formulată de Curtea de Apel Cluj - Secţia a IV-a pentru litigii de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 704/117/2018, cu privire la interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 11 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 90/2017 privind unele măsuri fiscal-bugetare, modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative şi prorogarea unor termene, aprobată cu completări prin Legea nr. 80/2018, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, coroborat cu dispoziţiile art. 44 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare şi stabilirea “modalităţii în care mai pot fi considerate suspendate ajutoarele sau, după caz, indemnizaţiile la ieşirea la pensie, retragere, încetarea raporturilor de serviciu ori la trecerea în rezervă, ulterior datei de 1 iulie 2017, dată la care au fost abrogate aceste drepturi prin Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 20 mai 2019.