Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1438/2018 AI generated

Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion referred to competent court of appeal as material incompetence sustained.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1438/2018
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the exception of its own material incompetence and referred the applicant's request for the transfer (strămutare) of Case No. x/2018 pending before the Calafat Court of First Instance to the Craiova Court of Appeal for resolution, with no appeal available. The dispute concerned a request to transfer a case filed after the entry into force of the new Civil Procedure Code, based on legitimate suspicion. The decisive legal basis was Article 142(1), first thesis, of the Civil Procedure Code, which provides that a request for transfer based on legitimate suspicion falls within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the court from which transfer is sought is a first-instance court or tribunal within its circuit, applied together with Article 24 of the same code; the High Court thus declined jurisdiction in favor of the competent appellate court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 142 alin. (1) teza I C. proc. civ, Art. 24 C. proc. civ; Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion referred to competent court of appeal as material incompetence sustained: x/2018 pending before the Calafat Court of First Instance to the Craiova Court of Appeal for resolution, with no appeal available. The dispute concerned a request to transfer a case filed after the entry into force of the new Civil Procedure Code, based on legitimate suspicion. The decisive legal basis was Article 142(1), first thesis, of the Civil Procedure Code, which provides that a request for transfer based on legitimate suspicion falls within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the court from which transfer is sought is a first-instance court or tribunal within its circuit, applied together with Article 24 of the same code; the High Court thus declined jurisdiction in favor of the competent appellate court.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code declining of jurisdiction transfer of evidence serious defect in foreign proceedings entry into force disciplinary transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (1) teza I C. proc. civ
The provision establishing the competence of the court of appeal for transfer requests based on legitimate suspicion, which grounded the decline of jurisdiction.
Art. 24 C. proc. civ
The procedural rule applied in the dispositive to determine the applicable law based on the date the action was filed.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1933/2019
Transfer of civil case for legitimate suspicion: material competence of Court of Appeal under new Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 989/2017
Transfer request for legitimate suspicion sent to appellate court over High Court for lack of material competence.
Decizia nr. 1284/2019
Transfer request over legitimate suspicion sent to court of appeal; High Court declines jurisdiction on material incompetence
Decizia nr. 5643/2013
Civil case transfer request for legitimate suspicion declared incompetent and referred to the Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 802/2019
Jurisdictional allocation for judicial transfer based on legitimate suspicion: material competence of the Court of Appeal over the High Court of Cassation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (1) teza I C. proc. civ.

The provision establishing the competence of the court of appeal for transfer requests based on legitimate suspicion, which grounded the decline of jurisdiction.

Art. 24 C. proc. civ.

The procedural rule applied in the dispositive to determine the applicable law based on the date the action was filed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatând că se solicită strămutarea Dosarului nr. x/2018, al Judecătoriei Calafat, având ca obiect o acţiune formulată după data intrării în vigoare a noului C. proc. civ., în considerarea dispoziţiilor art. 142 alin. (1) teza I din acelaşi act normativ, potrivit cărora "Cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competenţa curţii de apel, dacă instanţa de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripţia acesteia", raportat şi la dispoziţiile art. 24 din acelaşi cod, urmează să decline competenţa de soluţionare a cererii formulate de petentul A., privind strămutarea judecării cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. x/2018, în favoarea instanţei competente, respectiv Curţii de Apel Craiova, motiv pentru care,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Admite excepţia necompetenţei materiale a Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie.

Trimite cererea formulată de petentul A., privind strămutarea judecării cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. x/2018, al Judecătoriei Calafat, Curţii de Apel Craiova, în vederea soluţionării.

Fără nicio cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 25 aprilie 2018.

Procesat de GGC - LM