Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_147664 AI generated

Referral regarding recalculation of penal execution under Law 254/2013 declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_147664
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Tribunal of Maramureş concerning a penal enforcement case (Case No. 1005/336/2018). The dispute centered on whether the interpretation of Article 551 of Law No. 254/2013 permits the modification of the legal classification and sanction regime during a contestation to enforcement filed under Article 598(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically as a consequence of recalculating the "executed or considered as executed" penalty in light of Article 43(1) and (5) of the Penal Code. The court refused to intervene in the legal question, establishing that the referral was not admissible for resolution by the Plenum for the Resolution of Issues of Law in Criminal Matters.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art.551 din Legea nr.254/2013, art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală; Referral regarding recalculation of penal execution under Law 254/2013 declared inadmissible: 1005/336/2018). The dispute centered on whether the interpretation of Article 551 of Law No. 254/2013 permits the modification of the legal classification and sanction regime during a contestation to enforcement filed under Article 598(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically as a consequence of recalculating the "executed or considered as executed" penalty in light of Article 43(1) and (5) of the Penal Code. The court refused to intervene in the legal question, establishing that the referral was not admissible for resolution by the Plenum for the Resolution of Issues of Law in Criminal Matters.

Keywords

AI generated
code of criminal procedure penal sanctions preliminary ruling procedure enforcement of ruling interpretation of the law matter in dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art.551 din Legea nr.254/2013
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală
Provision cited to establish the binding effect and date of entry into force of the decision following its publication in the Official Gazette.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală

Provision cited to establish the binding effect and date of entry into force of the decision following its publication in the Official Gazette.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr.7 Dosar nr.225/1/2019

Şedinţa din data de 21 martie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Maramureş în dosarul nr.1005/336/2018, prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „dacă interpretarea dispoziţiilor art.551 din Legea nr.254/2013 permite, în cadrul contestaţiei la executare formulate în baza art.598 lit.d din Codul de procedură penală, schimbarea încadrării juridice şi a regimului sancţionator avut în vedere la momentul judecării cauzei, ca o consecinţă a recalculării pedepsei „executate sau considerată ca executată”, astfel recalculată, urmare aplicării dispoziţiilor art.551 din Legea nr.254/2013 cu raportare la art.43 alin.(1) şi (5) din Codul penal”.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 21 martie 2019.