Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_147650 AI generated

Precedent for whether forced execution of inheritance assets may proceed before probate establishes heir status and quotas

Case Number ICCJ_147650
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Tribunal, thereby leaving the lower court to determine the issue without a binding interpretative decision from the supreme court. The dispute concerned a civil procedure question regarding the enforceability of inheritance assets against accepting heirs who were the successors of a deceased debtor, specifically whether forced execution could commence before the establishment of inheritance quotas and the formal determination of heir status through probate proceedings. The legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 688(2) of the Civil Procedure Code and Article 1155(2) of the Civil Code, which govern the rights of heirs and the scope of forced execution in the context of succession.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Precedent for whether forced execution of inheritance assets may proceed before probate establishes heir status and quotas: The dispute concerned a civil procedure question regarding the enforceability of inheritance assets against accepting heirs who were the successors of a deceased debtor, specifically whether forced execution could commence before the establishment of inheritance quotas and the formal determination of heir status through probate proceedings. The legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 688(2) of the Civil Procedure Code and Article 1155(2) of the Civil Code, which govern the rights of heirs and the scope of forced execution in the context of succession.

Keywords

AI generated
determination of legal heir Roman law request to proceed with execution preliminary decision legal status preliminary ruling procedure
AI generated
ICCJ_148186
Admissibility of forced execution against inherited property of accepting successors prior to issuance of heir certificate
Decizia nr. 12/2019
Pre-referral admissibility: prior judicial enforcement of accepted inheritance estate before heir certification and succession discussion
Decizia nr. 17/2019
Referral on forced execution against accepted heirs' estate without heir's certificate rejected as inadmissible due to lack of novelty and difficulty
ICCJ_192467
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on fiscal forced execution in insolvency proceedings and unique insolvency account
Decizia nr. 5424/2004
Probate Partition: Misapplication of Succession Quotas and Allocation of Sold Indivisible Property Lots

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 12 Dosar nr. 3166/1/2018

Şedinţa din 11 martie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a V-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 6390/299/2018, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept: „Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 688 alin. (2) din Codul de procedură civilă şi art. 1.155 alin. (2) din Codul civil, în sensul de a se stabili dacă există posibilitatea începerii executării silite a bunurilor moştenirii împotriva moştenitorilor acceptanţi ai debitorului decedat, cât timp nu au fost stabilite cotele succesorale şi calitatea de moştenitor a acestora în cadrul dezbaterii succesorale.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 11 martie 2019.