Calculation of judicial service pension tenure: cross-reference scope in Art. 82(5) of Law 303/2004
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting through its full bench for legal interpretation, admitted the referral from the Court of Appeal and issued a mandatory interpretative ruling on the calculation of service pensions for judges and prosecutors. The dispute concerned the application of Article 82(5) of Law No. 303/2004 regarding the statutory pension for judicial and prosecutorial officials, specifically questioning how to compute the required years of service and the cross-reference to other provisions within the same article. The court determined that for the purpose of granting the pension under Article 82(5), only the length of service in the specific functions enumerated in that subparagraph shall be considered, and clarified that the cross-reference to Article 82(1) applies solely to the condition of having at least 25 years of total service.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 82 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 303/2004, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Calculation of judicial service pension tenure: cross-reference scope in Art. 82(5) of Law 303/2004: The dispute concerned the application of Article 82(5) of Law No. 303/2004 regarding the statutory pension for judicial and prosecutorial officials, specifically questioning how to compute the required years of service and the cross-reference to other provisions within the same article. The court determined that for the purpose of granting the pension under Article 82(5), only the length of service in the specific functions enumerated in that subparagraph shall be considered, and clarified that the cross-reference to Article 82(1) applies solely to the condition of having at least 25 years of total service.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the interpretative ruling for the referred case and other pending cases.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 3095/1/2018
Şedinţa din 11 martie 2019
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 897/118/2018, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
Pentru acordarea pensiei de serviciu în baza dispoziţiilor art. 82 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, la stabilirea condiţiilor de vechime trebuie avută în vedere numai vechimea în funcţiile enumerate în cuprinsul acestui alineat, iar trimiterea la prevederile alin. (1) ale aceluiaşi articol se referă la perioada de cel puţin 25 de ani.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 11 martie 2019.