Dismissal of appeal for non-inclusion of commercial registration details in the petition under Article 302 of the Civil Procedure Code
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the appeal for lack of compliance with procedural formal requirements, leaving the first-instance civil judgment in force. The dispute involved a limited liability company challenging a decision by a public finance authority and an accompanying fiscal control report, but the appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to include its commercial registration number, unique registration code, tax code, or bank account in the petition as mandated for legal entities. The court’s decisive legal basis was Article 302(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (as amended by Government Emergency Ordinance No. 58/2003), which stipulates these mandatory details, leading to dismissal under Article 308(4) of the same Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 3021 pct. 1 C. proc. civ, art. 308 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Dismissal of appeal for non-inclusion of commercial registration details in the petition under Article 302 of the Civil Procedure Code: The dispute involved a limited liability company challenging a decision by a public finance authority and an accompanying fiscal control report, but the appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to include its commercial registration number, unique registration code, tax code, or bank account in the petition as mandated for legal entities. The court’s decisive legal basis was Article 302(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (as amended by Government Emergency Ordinance No. 58/2003), which stipulates these mandatory details, leading to dismissal under Article 308(4) of the same Code.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProvision explicitly cited as the basis for dismissing the appeal due to failure to meet procedural requirements.
Full text
Asupra recursului de față;
Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:
La data de 27 noiembrie 2003, reclamanta SC G.P. SRL Arad a formulat recurs împotriva sentinței civile nr. 2868/2003 a Tribunalului Arad, secția comercială și de contencios administrativ, sentință prin care a fost respinsă acțiunea reclamantei privind anularea deciziei nr. 223/2003 a Direcției Generale a Finanțelor Publice Arad, și a procesului-verbal de control din 22 noiembrie 2002, emis de Direcția Controlului Fiscal Arad.
Potrivit art. 3021 pct. 1 C. proc. civ., modificat prin O.U.G. nr. 58/2003, cererea de recurs trebuie să cuprindă pentru persoanele juridice, și numărul de înmatriculare în Registrul comerțului, codul unic de înregistrare sau după caz, codul fiscal, contul bancar.
Cum recurenta nu a respectat aceste dispoziții legale, în baza art. 308 alin. (4) C. proc. civ. modificat, Curtea va respinge recursul. Prezenta decizie se va comunica recurentei.
PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D E C I D E
Respinge recursul declarat de SC G.P. SRL Arad împotriva sentinței civile nr. 2868 din 7 octombrie 2003 a Tribunalului Arad, secția comercială și de contencios administrativ.
Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 6 aprilie 2004.