Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_147235 AI generated

Interpretation of jurisdictional norms for complementary contraventional sanctions in inter-county traffic violations under Romanian road circulation regulations

Case Number ICCJ_147235
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Tribunal of Vrancea, rejecting the request for a binding interpretation of Romanian traffic law. The dispute concerned whether Article 191 of the Regulation implementing Emergency Government Ordinance No. 195/2002 constitutes a special norm derogating from the general rule in Article 109(1) of the same Ordinance, specifically regarding the competence of the head of the road police service in the county where the traffic violation was committed versus the county where the offender is registered for the purpose of applying complementary contraventional sanctions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Interpretation of jurisdictional norms for complementary contraventional sanctions in inter-county traffic violations under Romanian road circulation regulations: The dispute concerned whether Article 191 of the Regulation implementing Emergency Government Ordinance No. 195/2002 constitutes a special norm derogating from the general rule in Article 109(1) of the same Ordinance, specifically regarding the competence of the head of the road police service in the county where the traffic violation was committed versus the county where the offender is registered for the purpose of applying complementary contraventional sanctions.

Keywords

AI generated
road traffic law violation of jurisdiction rules interpretation of the law implementing Regulation emergency ordinance rule of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to state that the decision of the complete for resolving issues of law is obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3221/2013
Jurisdiction for Contraventional Plangere: Temporal Application of Revised Territorial Competence Rules to Pending Traffic Violation Cases
Decizia nr. 8/2019
Competence for complementary license suspension sanctions: hierarchy of norms vs. application regulation derogation in cross-county traffic offenses
Decizia nr. 5546/2021
Jurisdictional conflict over contraventional sanctions: special procedural norms supersede general administrative litigation rules to assign competence to the court of the location of the violation
Decizia nr. 726/2023
Priority of special road traffic jurisdiction over general alternative contravention rules in negative conflicts of competence
Decizia nr. 1491/2017
Jurisdiction for revision of contraventional traffic sanction: exclusive competence of rendering court despite erroneous filing

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to state that the decision of the complete for resolving issues of law is obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 3179/1/2018

Şedinţa din 25 februarie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Vrancea – Secţia a II-a civilă şi de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 15930/231/2016, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Interpretarea art. 191 din Regulamentul de aplicare a Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 195/2002 privind circulaţia pe drumurile publice, aprobat prin Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1391/2006, în sensul dacă acesta reprezintă o normă specială ce derogă de la norma generală, instituită de art. 109 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 195/2002 privind circulaţia pe drumurile publice, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, şi stabileşte o competenţă specială a şefului serviciului poliţiei rutiere pe teritoriul căruia a fost constatată contravenţia, sub aspectul aplicării sancţiunii contravenţionale complementare, în situaţia în care contravenientul a săvârşit fapta pe raza de competenţă a altui judeţ decât cel care îl are în evidenţă.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 25 februarie 2019.