Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_147221 AI generated

Interpretation of gross versus net salary records in labor books for public pension calculations under Law No. 263/2010

Case Number ICCJ_147221
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary decision submitted by the Ploiești Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 165(1) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the public pension system, specifically focusing on the definition of "gross or net salaries" in relation to entries in the labor book (labor record). The core legal issue was how to interpret the reference to salaries in the labor book by cross-referencing with earlier normative acts that mandated recording the grade-classified remuneration in that document. The decision relied on Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code to establish that the specific submission did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 165 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Interpretation of gross versus net salary records in labor books for public pension calculations under Law No. 263/2010: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 165(1) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the public pension system, specifically focusing on the definition of "gross or net salaries" in relation to entries in the labor book (labor record). The core legal issue was how to interpret the reference to salaries in the labor book by cross-referencing with earlier normative acts that mandated recording the grade-classified remuneration in that document. The decision relied on Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code to establish that the specific submission did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation reference for a preliminary ruling gross wage interpretation of the law legal systems Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 165 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010
„Lămurirea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the binding nature of the court's decision dismissing the preliminary question.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 6/2019
Interpretation of "gross or net salaries" in work booklets for pre-2001 pension recalculation under the Public Pension System
Decizia nr. 121/2009
Annuity calculation dispute: omission to examine Labor Code gross salary definition and ministerial guidance in appellate review
ICCJ_178652
Pre-pension calculation inclusion of pre-2001 non-wage earnings proven by employer certificates under Law 263/2010
ICCJ_137608
Pension Calculation: Rejection of Admissibility for Preliminary Ruling on Pre-2001 Income vs. Work Book Salaries under Contributory Principle
Decizia nr. 5661/2013
Legality of salary benchmarking for promoted public employees under Law 285/2010

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the binding nature of the court's decision dismissing the preliminary question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 6 Dosar nr. 2877/1/2018

Şedinţa din 11 februarie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Ploieşti - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 7577/105/2017, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Lămurirea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, referitoare la noţiunea de „salarii brute sau nete, după caz, în conformitate cu modul de înscriere a acestora în carnetul de muncă”, prin raportare la actele normative ce reglementau modul de întocmire a carnetului de muncă şi care stabileau că în acesta se înscrie retribuţia tarifară de încadrare”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 11 februarie 2019.