Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_147099 AI generated

Inadmissibility of reference regarding judicial enforcement of mediation agreements for divorce under Law No. 192/2006

Case Number ICCJ_147099
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a uniform interpretation of the law filed by the Buzau Tribunal. The underlying dispute involved a civil proceeding concerning divorce and related accessory matters, where the lower court sought clarification on whether it could directly enforce a mediation agreement reached by the parties under Articles 59(2) and 64(2) of Law No. 192/2006 on mediation. The Court’s decisive legal basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the mandatory admissibility requirements for such references, resulting in no new legal interpretation being established and the case remaining subject to the procedural rulings of the referring court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 59 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 192/2006; Inadmissibility of reference regarding judicial enforcement of mediation agreements for divorce under Law No. 192/2006: The underlying dispute involved a civil proceeding concerning divorce and related accessory matters, where the lower court sought clarification on whether it could directly enforce a mediation agreement reached by the parties under Articles 59(2) and 64(2) of Law No. 192/2006 on mediation. The Court’s decisive legal basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the mandatory admissibility requirements for such references, resulting in no new legal interpretation being established and the case remaining subject to the procedural rulings of the referring court.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial law reference agreement Civil Procedure Code matter in dispute enforcement uniform interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 59 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 192/2006
(2) şi art. 59 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 192/2006 privind medierea şi organizarea profesiei de mediator, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare?”
AI generated
ICCJ_119332
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling reference on interpretation of civil procedure code provisions
ICCJ_120629
Inadmissibility of reference for unification of legal principles in administrative and fiscal litigation
Decizia nr. 3/2019
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on ratification of mediation agreements for divorce under Law 192/2006
ICCJ_199871
Inadmissibility of reference for uniform case law on fiscal enforcement restoration: Art. 262(4) Law 207/2015 vs. Art. 724 Civil Procedure Code
ICCJ_133066
Mediation agreement temporal law question inadmissible; prior ruling stands.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 3 Dosar nr. 2713/1/2018

Şedinţa din 14 ianuarie 2019

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Buzău - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 14090/200/2017, cu privire la dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „instanţa de judecată poate lua act de acordul de mediere, prin care părţile s-au înţeles cu privire la desfacerea căsătoriei şi la rezolvarea aspectelor accesorii divorţului, conform art. 64 alin. (2) şi art. 59 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 192/2006 privind medierea şi organizarea profesiei de mediator, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare?”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 14 ianuarie 2019.