Insolvency reorganization plan prohibition on installment payment of current and budgetary claims
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Romania (High Court of Cassation and Justice), acting through its Panel for the Resolution of Legal Questions, issued a mandatory binding interpretation ruling, admitting the referral by the Appeal Court and establishing that, under Article 133(4)(e) of Law No. 85/2014 on insolvency, a debtor's reorganization plan cannot provide for the installments or deferral of payment for current claims, including budgetary claims. The case involved a civil insolvency procedure where the lower court sought a pre-trial ruling on the admissibility of such installments in a reorganization plan. The decisive legal basis is the specific prohibition found in Article 133(4)(e) of Law No. 85/2014, which restricts the modification of payment terms for current liabilities during reorganization, thereby mandating that current claims must be paid in full or according to their original terms without the benefit of installment plans.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 133 alin. (4) lit. e) din Legea nr. 85/2014, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Insolvency reorganization plan prohibition on installment payment of current and budgetary claims: 85/2014 on insolvency, a debtor's reorganization plan cannot provide for the installments or deferral of payment for current claims, including budgetary claims. The case involved a civil insolvency procedure where the lower court sought a pre-trial ruling on the admissibility of such installments in a reorganization plan. The decisive legal basis is the specific prohibition found in Article 133(4)(e) of Law No. 85/2014, which restricts the modification of payment terms for current liabilities during reorganization, thereby mandating that current claims must be paid in full or according to their original terms without the benefit of installment plans.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural rule establishing that the decision is obligatory and binding for the referred court.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.5 Dosar nr. 2788/1/2018
Şedinţa din 14 ianuarie 2019
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Galaţi – Secţia a II-a Civilă în dosarul nr. 4568/121/2016/a9 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 133 alin. (4) lit. e) din Legea nr. 85/2014, planul de reorganizare a debitorului nu poate să prevadă eşalonarea la plată a creanţelor curente (inclusiv a celor bugetare).
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 14 ianuarie 2019.