Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_146168 AI generated

Special attachment of owners' association maintenance fees in enforcement proceedings: preliminary ruling admitted and legal nature established

Case Number ICCJ_146168
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting through its Panel for the Resolution of Legal Issues, admitted a preliminary ruling request from the Mureș Tribunal and established that monthly maintenance fees owed by an individual to an owners' association are subject to special attachment (affectațiune specială) corresponding to their specific statutory components. The dispute arose in civil enforcement proceedings where a third-party debtor, who was also a member of the debtors' owners' association, challenged the legal nature of the withheld sums under Romanian law. Relying on Article 781(5)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 46–48 of Law No. 230/2007, and Article 12(B)(c) of Government Order No. 1588/2007, the court ruled that these specific charges retain their distinct legal character for attachment purposes rather than being treated as general unsecured debts, thereby clarifying the priority and classification of such payments in execution procedures.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 781 alin. (5) lit. a) din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 46-48 din Legea nr. 230/2007, art. 12 pct. B) lit. c) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1588/2007, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Special attachment of owners' association maintenance fees in enforcement proceedings: preliminary ruling admitted and legal nature established: The dispute arose in civil enforcement proceedings where a third-party debtor, who was also a member of the debtors' owners' association, challenged the legal nature of the withheld sums under Romanian law. Relying on Article 781(5)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 46–48 of Law No. 230/2007, and Article 12(B)(c) of Government Order No. 1588/2007, the court ruled that these specific charges retain their distinct legal character for attachment purposes rather than being treated as general unsecured debts, thereby clarifying the priority and classification of such payments in execution procedures.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement of maintenance debts charging of fees enforcement by attachment preliminary ruling procedure articles of association article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 781 alin. (5) lit. a) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive as part of the legal basis for interpreting the special attachment of maintenance fees.
art. 46-48 din Legea nr. 230/2007
Cited in the dispositive to define the components of maintenance fees subject to special attachment.
art. 12 pct. B) lit. c) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1588/2007
Cited in the dispositive to determine the specific statutory components of the charges.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory nature of the decision.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 781 alin. (5) lit. a) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive as part of the legal basis for interpreting the special attachment of maintenance fees.

art. 46-48 din Legea nr. 230/2007

Cited in the dispositive to define the components of maintenance fees subject to special attachment.

art. 12 pct. B) lit. c) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1588/2007

Cited in the dispositive to determine the specific statutory components of the charges.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 84 Dosar nr. 2297/1/2018

Şedinţa din 26 noiembrie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Mureş – Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 8187/320/2016*, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 781 alin. (5) lit. a) din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 46-48 din Legea nr. 230/2007, art. 12 pct. B) lit. c) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1588/2007, sumele datorate lunar de terţul poprit, membru al asociaţiei de proprietari, debitoarei asociaţia de proprietari, cu titlu de cheltuieli de întreţinere, au afectaţiunea specială corespunzătoare diferitelor componente ale acestor cheltuieli, astfel cum sunt determinate de legislaţia în materie.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 26 noiembrie 2018.