Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_145563 AI generated

Mediation ineligible for disputes over special-work-condition classification.

Case Number ICCJ_145563
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the joined referrals and, in a preliminary ruling on a question of law, held that negotiations concerning the classification of work in groups I and/or II (special and/or deosebite conditions) cannot be the subject of mediation under Law No. 192/2006 on mediation. The ruling is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute arose from three civil cases before the Ploiești Court of Appeal, where the issue was whether disputes over the legal right to have work experience recognized as performed under special or deosebite conditions could be settled through mandatory mediation. The Court reasoned that such classification is a legal determination based on legislative criteria, not a matter of free negotiation between parties, and therefore falls outside the scope of mediation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Mediation ineligible for disputes over special-work-condition classification: 192/2006 on mediation. The ruling is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute arose from three civil cases before the Ploiești Court of Appeal, where the issue was whether disputes over the legal right to have work experience recognized as performed under special or deosebite conditions could be settled through mandatory mediation. The Court reasoned that such classification is a legal determination based on legislative criteria, not a matter of free negotiation between parties, and therefore falls outside the scope of mediation.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute working conditions Civil Procedure Code special legislative procedure right to work preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Establishes the binding force of the preliminary ruling.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 79/2018
Mediation eligibility for retroactive work group classifications and special working conditions under pension legislation
Decizia nr. 214/2023
Work-group classification dispute excluded from cassation review under labor conflict provisions
Decizia nr. 428/2024
Inadmissibility of Cassation in Labor Disputes under Exclusive Court of Appeal Jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 823/2015
Labor conflict over special working conditions: cassation appeal declared inadmissible
Decizia nr. 1964/2016
Challenging administrative refusal of special work conditions classification based on unreviewed technical and medical expert reports

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Establishes the binding force of the preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 79 Dosar nr. 1998/1/2018

Şedinţa din 12 noiembrie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizările conexate formulate de Curtea de Apel Ploieşti - Secţia I civilă, în dosarele nr. 3012/105/2017, nr. 3087/105/2017 şi nr. 3533/105/2017, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că, prin raportare la prevederile Legii nr. 192/2006 privind medierea şi organizarea profesiei de mediator, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, nu pot face obiect al medierii negocierile cu privire la acordarea/încadrarea în grupele I şi/sau a II-a de muncă, respectiv, condiţii deosebite şi/sau condiţii speciale.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 12 noiembrie 2018.