Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_145561 AI generated

Admissibility of judicial referral on unilateral contract termination validity under Decree No. 31/1954

Case Number ICCJ_145561
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania (High Court of Cassation and Justice), sitting as the Chamber for Resolving Legal Issues, dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bacău Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned a civil matter involving the unilateral termination of a contract by the management bodies of a legal entity, specifically challenging whether such an act, in the absence of statutory or contractual authorization, constituted an illicit juridical act or legal fact under Article 35 of Decree No. 31/1954 regarding natural and legal persons. The court’s decision, rendered pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, results in the rejection of the specific legal question without a substantive ruling on its merits, leaving the underlying procedural status of the lower court's case unaffected by this specific high-court intervention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of judicial referral on unilateral contract termination validity under Decree No. 31/1954: The dispute concerned a civil matter involving the unilateral termination of a contract by the management bodies of a legal entity, specifically challenging whether such an act, in the absence of statutory or contractual authorization, constituted an illicit juridical act or legal fact under Article 35 of Decree No. 31/1954 regarding natural and legal persons. The court’s decision, rendered pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, results in the rejection of the specific legal question without a substantive ruling on its merits, leaving the underlying procedural status of the lower court's case unaffected by this specific high-court intervention.

Keywords

AI generated
termination of a contract preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code matter in dispute legal status preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling request.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 77/2018
Inadmissible referral on whether unlawful unilateral contract termination by directors is legal act or tort.
Încheierea nr. 3586/2013
Validity of unilateral contract termination by employee
ICCJ_229365
Employment contract suspension and unconsolidated legal relationships: Referral for uniform interpretation declared inadmissible
Decizia nr. 1371/2008
Validity of unilateral termination of association in participation contract and admissibility of declaration of illegality action
Decizia nr. 6268/2019
Constitutionality of unilateral concession contract termination by county president versus council resolution requirement

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 77 Dosar nr. 1981/1/2018

Şedinţa din 12 noiembrie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE: Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile, formulată de Curtea de Apel Bacău - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 4299/110/2016, cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept: „Denunţarea unilaterală a unui contract de către organele de conducere ale persoanei juridice, în ipoteza în care nici legea şi nici contractul nu reglementează dreptul de denunţare unilaterală a contractului constituie act juridic sau fapt juridic ilicit în sensul art. 35 din Decretul nr. 31/1954 privitor la persoanele fizice si persoanele juridice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare? " Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 12 noiembrie 2018.