Non-employee creditor claims filed after insolvency opening deemed inadmissible unless submitted to court and registered
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as the panel for resolving legal questions, admitted a reference from the Court of Appeal and issued a binding interpretation establishing that claims filed by non-employee creditors with debts preceding the opening of insolvency proceedings must be submitted to the court within the deadline set in the opening decision and recorded in a register kept at the court registry. This ruling resolves a procedural dispute regarding the correct venue and method for filing such claims under the new insolvency legislation, specifically addressing whether these applications belong in the court or with the liquidator. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 102(1), first and second sentences, of Law No. 85/2014, read in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that the submission to the tribunal and registration at the clerk's office are compulsory requirements for the admissibility of these pre-existing creditor claims.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 102 alin. (1) teza I şi a II-a din Legea nr. 85/2014, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Non-employee creditor claims filed after insolvency opening deemed inadmissible unless submitted to court and registered: This ruling resolves a procedural dispute regarding the correct venue and method for filing such claims under the new insolvency legislation, specifically addressing whether these applications belong in the court or with the liquidator. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 102(1), first and second sentences, of Law No. 85/2014, read in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that the submission to the tribunal and registration at the clerk's office are compulsory requirements for the admissibility of these pre-existing creditor claims.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThe main ground for the decision, as the court interprets and applies these provisions to establish the rule regarding the filing of creditor claims.
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to state that the interpretation is mandatory for all courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.72 Dosar nr. 1370/1/2018
Şedinţa din 15 octombrie 2018
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Secţia a II-a Civilă, de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal în dosarul nr. 2168/88/2016/a1, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 102 alin. (1) teza I şi a II-a din Legea nr. 85/2014, cererile de admitere a creanţelor, formulate de creditorii cu creanţe anterioare datei de deschidere a procedurii, alţii decât salariaţii, trebuie să fie depuse la tribunal în termenul fixat prin hotărârea de deschidere a procedurii şi înregistrate într-un registru care se va păstra la grefa tribunalului.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 15 octombrie 2018.