Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_144260 AI generated

Recidivism Prior Penalty Calculation: Recalculated Sentence Under Law 254/2013 Article 551 vs. Original Sentence

Case Number ICCJ_144260
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the request for a preliminary ruling and established that, for the purpose of the recidivism definition under Article 43(1) and (5) of the Penal Code, the prior sentence "executed or considered as executed" is the recalculated sentence resulting from the application of Article 551 of Law No. 254/2013, rather than the original duration calculated pursuant to Article 71 of the Penal Code. This binding interpretation, issued following a referral by the Court of Appeal of Craiova, resolves a legal dispute regarding whether the statutory reduction of penalties under the 2013 criminal law recodification affects the calculation of the first element of recidivism. The decisive legal basis is the harmonization of the recidivism requirements in Article 43 of the Penal Code with the transitional recalculation provisions of Article 551 of Law No. 254/2013, which mandates the use of the reduced penalty for future criminal liability assessments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 551 din Legea nr. 254/2013, art. 43 alin. (1) şi alin. (5) Cod penal, art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Recidivism Prior Penalty Calculation: Recalculated Sentence Under Law 254/2013 Article 551 vs. Original Sentence: 254/2013, rather than the original duration calculated pursuant to Article 71 of the Penal Code. This binding interpretation, issued following a referral by the Court of Appeal of Craiova, resolves a legal dispute regarding whether the statutory reduction of penalties under the 2013 criminal law recodification affects the calculation of the first element of recidivism. The decisive legal basis is the harmonization of the recidivism requirements in Article 43 of the Penal Code with the transitional recalculation provisions of Article 551 of Law No. 254/2013, which mandates the use of the reduced penalty for future criminal liability assessments.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal recidivism reduction of sentence interpretation of the law prior use basis of calculation duration of liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 551 din Legea nr. 254/2013
(5) Cod penal, prin pedeapsa „executată sau considerată ca executată”, ce constituie primul termen al recidivei, se are în vedere pedeapsa recalculată ca urmare a aplicării art. 551 din Legea nr. 254/2013.
art. 43 alin. (1) şi alin. (5) Cod penal
Main ground for the ruling, as the court established the interpretation of the recidivism definition under these provisions.
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to determine the binding force and effective date of the decision upon publication.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 15/2018
Recidivism required when recalculated sentence deemed executed before new offense; penalty limits increased by half.
Decizia nr. 220/RC/2020
Correction of post-conviction recidivism sentence calculation: proper aggregation of prior convictions and deduction of time served
Decizia nr. 177/RC/2023
Post-conviction recidivism sentence calculation: unexecuted remainder of prior penalty and deduction of detention period
ICCJ_141597
Recalculation of effective sentence execution for inadequate detention conditions to determine residual penalty under conditional release regime
Decizia nr. 2411/2014
Recalculation of resultant criminal sentence under new Penal Code limits due to application of more favorable law post-conviction

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 43 alin. (1) şi alin. (5) Cod penal

Main ground for the ruling, as the court established the interpretation of the recidivism definition under these provisions.

art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to determine the binding force and effective date of the decision upon publication.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 15 Dosar nr. 1748/1/2018

Şedinţa din data de 26 septembrie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Craiova - Secţia penală şi pentru cauze cu minori în dosarul nr. 676/267/2017 prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a următoarei chestiuni de drept: „în interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 43 alin. (1) şi alin. (5) Cod penal pentru pedeapsa anterioară ce constituie primul termen al recidivei, prin pedeapsă „executată sau considerată ca executată” se are în vedere pedeapsa astfel recalculată urmare a aplicării art. 551 din Legea nr. 254/2013 sau durata pedepsei aplicată anterior prin hotărârea definitivă de condamnare calculată conform dispoziţiilor art. 71 Cod penal raportat la art. 186 Cod penal”.

Stabileşte că, în interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 43 alin. (1) şi alin. (5) Cod penal, prin pedeapsa „executată sau considerată ca executată”, ce constituie primul termen al recidivei, se are în vedere pedeapsa recalculată ca urmare a aplicării art. 551 din Legea nr. 254/2013.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 26 septembrie 2018.