Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_144253 AI generated

Prescription start date for administrative compensation actions: communication of illegal act versus finality of annulment judgment

Case Number ICCJ_144253
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the interpretation of the prescription period for filing compensation claims in administrative litigation, specifically whether the term begins running from the communication of the illegal administrative act or from the finality of the judicial decision annulling that act. The court’s decision relies on Article 19 and Article 11(2) of Law No. 554/2004 (Administrative Procedure Code) regarding the calculation of prescription, in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure governing the admissibility of referrals to the Complete Court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Prescription start date for administrative compensation actions: communication of illegal act versus finality of annulment judgment: The dispute concerned the interpretation of the prescription period for filing compensation claims in administrative litigation, specifically whether the term begins running from the communication of the illegal administrative act or from the finality of the judicial decision annulling that act. The court’s decision relies on Article 19 and Article 11(2) of Law No. 554/2004 (Administrative Procedure Code) regarding the calculation of prescription, in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure governing the admissibility of referrals to the Complete Court.

Keywords

AI generated
action for annulment date of filing prescription Civil Procedure Code preliminary decision judicial law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the final order to establish the mandatory effect of the decision for all courts.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4694/2023
Compensation for delay in payment under administrative annulment statute; start of prescription period determined by knowledge of harm rather than finality of annulment judgment
Decizia nr. 3750/2020
Prescription of administrative compensation claim: commencement of limitation period at knowledge of damage versus final annulment of unlawful act under Law 554/2004
Decizia nr. 3202/2023
Prescription of administrative compensation claims for delayed insurance payouts: start date is notification of the refusal decision, not final annulment
Decizia nr. 1545/2023
Starting point of the one-year prescription period for administrative damages under Law No. 554/2004: finality of annulment versus communication of the unlawful act
Decizia nr. 1241/2023
Starting point of the one-year prescription period for compensation claims after annulment of an administrative act

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the final order to establish the mandatory effect of the decision for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 61 Dosar nr. 1381/1/2018

Şedinţa din 24 septembrie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București – Secția a VIII-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 2489/98/2016, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 19 din Legea contenciosului administrativ nr. 554/2004, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, prin raportare la dispoziţiile art. 11 alin. (2) din acelaşi act normativ, în sensul de a se stabili care este momentul de la care începe să curgă termenul de prescripţie pentru introducerea acţiunii în despăgubire, respectiv de la momentul comunicării actului administrativ nelegal sau de la data rămânerii definitive a hotărârii de anulare a acestui act.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 24 septembrie 2018.