Inadmissibility of reference on legal nature of 10-day prosecutorial deadline under criminal procedure law
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the reference for preliminary ruling as inadmissible, thereby leaving the lower court's proceedings unaffected. The dispute concerned a procedural question raised by the Suceava Court of Appeal, specifically whether the 10-day deadline stipulated for the prosecutor's decision in cases where criminal liability is extinguished constitutes a statute of limitation (peremption) or a mere recommendation. The decisive legal basis was the procedural rules governing the admissibility of requests for clarifying decisions on matters of law under the Code of Criminal Procedure, which led the Court to determine that the request did not meet the requirements for a binding principle-binding decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Inadmissibility of reference on legal nature of 10-day prosecutorial deadline under criminal procedure law: The dispute concerned a procedural question raised by the Suceava Court of Appeal, specifically whether the 10-day deadline stipulated for the prosecutor's decision in cases where criminal liability is extinguished constitutes a statute of limitation (peremption) or a mere recommendation. The decisive legal basis was the procedural rules governing the admissibility of requests for clarifying decisions on matters of law under the Code of Criminal Procedure, which led the Court to determine that the request did not meet the requirements for a binding principle-binding decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the operative part to establish the binding nature and effective date of the decision from its publication in the Official Gazette.
Full text
R O M Â N I A
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ
Minuta deciziei nr. 11 Dosar nr. 1198/1/2018
Şedinţa din data de 12 septembrie 2018
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D E C I D E:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Suceava, în dosarul nr. 824/86/2018, prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a următoarei chestiuni de drept : „Care este natura juridică a termenului de 10 zile prevăzut de art.318 alin.12 Cod procedură penală, dacă este un termen de decădere sau de recomandare.”
Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 12 septembrie 2018.