Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_143078 AI generated

Judicial administrator’s power to verify timing of budgetary claims under Insolvency Law

Case Number ICCJ_143078
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral and established a mandatory uniform interpretation, ruling that the judicial administrator/liquidator possesses the legal right to verify budgetary claims documented in enforceable titles regarding their scope to determine whether they are anterior or posterior to the opening of the insolvency proceedings. This decision resolved a conflict of law concerning the scope of a judicial administrator's powers under the insolvency framework. The decisive legal basis consists of Articles 105(1) and (2) of Law No. 85/2014, which grants the administrator authority to examine and validate the timing of creditor claims to ensure proper classification within the insolvency process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Judicial administrator’s power to verify timing of budgetary claims under Insolvency Law: This decision resolved a conflict of law concerning the scope of a judicial administrator's powers under the insolvency framework. The decisive legal basis consists of Articles 105(1) and (2) of Law No. 85/2014, which grants the administrator authority to examine and validate the timing of creditor claims to ensure proper classification within the insolvency process.

Keywords

AI generated
insolvency judicial law conflict of powers budgetary classification framework decision enforceable decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the uniform interpretation provided is mandatory for all courts.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 11/2016
Judicial administrator lacks authority to substantively verify contested budgetary tax claims in insolvency proceedings
Decizia nr. 53/2018
Limits of insolvency practitioner's verification of budgetary claims arising from enforceable titles: scope and temporal classification relative to opening of proceedings
ICCJ_128110
Budgetary claims under insolvency: merits review reserved to specialized court
ICCJ_170779
Jurisdiction of insolvency judge over objections to compulsory enforcement by budgetary creditors and admissibility of presidential orders
ICCJ_162470
Exclusive competence of bankruptcy judge for fiscal enforcement objections and admissibility of interim relief under insolvency law affirmed via appeal in the interest of the law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the uniform interpretation provided is mandatory for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 53 Dosar nr. 778/1/2018

Şedinţa din 18 iunie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Cluj - Secţia a II-a Civilă în dosarul nr. 2496/84/2017/a1 şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea dispoziţiilor 105 alin. (1) şi (2) din Legea nr. 85/2014, administratorul/ lichidatorul judiciar are dreptul de a verifica creanţele bugetare constatate prin titluri executorii sub aspectul întinderii, pentru a stabili dacă acestea sunt anterioare sau ulterioare deschiderii procedurii de insolvenţă a debitoarei.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 18 iunie 2018.