Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_143066 AI generated

Inadmissibility of reference to interpret Law 12/1990 on illicit activities

Case Number ICCJ_143066
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Court of Appeal, resulting in no substantive legal resolution on the merit of the fiscal dispute. The procedural dispute concerned a referral under the fiscal administrative litigation code to interpret the provisions of Article 3 in relation to Article 1(b) of Law No. 12/1990 on protecting the population against illicit production, commerce, or service activities. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement of Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which mandates that the Court of Final Instance issues a binding mandatory decision on referred legal questions, leading to the inadmissibility of the specific reference made by the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 lit. b) din Legea nr. 12/1990, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of reference to interpret Law 12/1990 on illicit activities: The procedural dispute concerned a referral under the fiscal administrative litigation code to interpret the provisions of Article 3 in relation to Article 1(b) of Law No. 12/1990 on protecting the population against illicit production, commerce, or service activities. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement of Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which mandates that the Court of Final Instance issues a binding mandatory decision on referred legal questions, leading to the inadmissibility of the specific reference made by the lower court.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling fiscal law matter in dispute procedural issues article of civil procedure scope of applicable law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1 lit. b) din Legea nr. 12/1990
3 raportat la art. 1 lit. b) din Legea nr. 12/1990 privind protejarea populaţiei împotriva unor activităţi de producţie, comerţ sau prestări de servicii ilicite, republicată”.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Invoked to state that the decision is mandatory, serving as the procedural basis for the final binding nature of the ruling in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 75/2020
Inadmissibility of appeal against refusal of preliminary reference where request failed to identify specific question of law
Decizia nr. 769/2018
Constitutional exception to access justice: Inadmissibility of reference due to lack of nexus when merits of administrative fiscal act illegality were decided
ICCJ_119324
Inadmissibility of referral to resolve conflict of law on jurisdiction over complaints against decisions not to prosecute under Law No. 304/2004 and Code of Criminal Procedure
Decizia nr. 19/2017
Referral for preliminary ruling on representation of legal persons in criminal proceedings dismissed as inadmissible due to clear statutory text
ICCJ_130110
Inadmissibility of referral on procedural question regarding appeal mechanism for dismissal of constitutional review requests

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Invoked to state that the decision is mandatory, serving as the procedural basis for the final binding nature of the ruling in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 43 Dosar nr. 611/1/2018

Şedinţa din 11 iunie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Dolj – Secţia contencios administrativ fiscal, în dosarul nr. 32287/215/2016, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 3 raportat la art. 1 lit. b) din Legea nr. 12/1990 privind protejarea populaţiei împotriva unor activităţi de producţie, comerţ sau prestări de servicii ilicite, republicată”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 11 iunie 2018.