Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_142106 AI generated

Scope of public institution personnel regulations under EU 27/2006 and HG 1860/2006

Case Number ICCJ_142106
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Brașov Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of emergency government and government decree provisions regarding whether specific normative acts fall within the category of regulations applicable to public institution personnel that complement the primary salary ordinance. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural ineligibility of the reference question, resulting in no substantive determination on the legal issue and leaving the proceedings to the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of public institution personnel regulations under EU 27/2006 and HG 1860/2006: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of emergency government and government decree provisions regarding whether specific normative acts fall within the category of regulations applicable to public institution personnel that complement the primary salary ordinance. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural ineligibility of the reference question, resulting in no substantive determination on the legal issue and leaving the proceedings to the lower court.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling acts of the institutions public institution public employment law action by staff scope of applicable law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the dismissal of the request for a preliminary ruling.
AI generated
ICCJ_147649
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on salary classification of public-sector actors under O.U.G. 57/2015 and Law 284/2010
ICCJ_154523
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on public-sector salary maximums under Emergency Government Ordinance No. 57/2015
Decizia nr. 30/2018
Inadmissible preliminary ruling request on judicial daily allowance norm clarification for judges and prosecutors
Decizia nr. 322/2025
Preliminary ruling referral on salary caps for civil servants held inadmissible; High Court declines review as constitutional matter.
ICCJ_223191
Scope of public salary framework annex: whether territorial unit staff of the National Administration of State Reserves are covered by central apparatus remuneration norms

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the dismissal of the request for a preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 30 Dosar nr. 336/1/2018

Şedinţa din 14 mai 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Braşov -Secţia civilă în dosarul nr. 5100/62/2016 în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept: „dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 13 din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006, art. 18 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1860/2006 face parte din categoria reglementărilor aplicabile personalului din instituţiile publice, care vin în completarea art. 13 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 14 mai 2018.