Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_142105 AI generated

Disability pension enrollment under Law 19/2000 referral ruled inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_142105
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal Pitești seeking a preliminary ruling on whether enrollment in disability pension under Law No. 19/2000 constitutes an initial pension enrollment under Article 170(1) and (3) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system. The referring court had raised the question in a civil case, but the High Court found the referral did not meet the legal admissibility requirements for such a preliminary ruling. The decision, issued under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, is binding and was rendered in a public session on 14 May 2018.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Disability pension enrollment under Law 19/2000 referral ruled inadmissible: 19/2000 constitutes an initial pension enrollment under Article 170(1) and (3) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system. The referring court had raised the question in a civil case, but the High Court found the referral did not meet the legal admissibility requirements for such a preliminary ruling. The decision, issued under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, is binding and was rendered in a public session on 14 May 2018.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure administration of disability benefits pension rights termination of pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to make the decision binding for all courts, per the procedure for preliminary rulings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to make the decision binding for all courts, per the procedure for preliminary rulings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 29 Dosar nr. 252/1/2018

Şedinţa din 14 mai 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 2035/109/2017, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 170 alin. (1) şi (3) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, respectiv dacă înscrierea la pensie de invaliditate în baza Legii nr. 19/2000 privind sistemul public de pensii şi alte drepturi de asigurări sociale, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, constituie sau nu înscrierea iniţială la pensie conform prevederilor de mai sus.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 14 mai 2018.