Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_141588 AI generated

Preliminary ruling request on judicial executor chamber's standing ruled inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_141588
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Caraș-Severin Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether the Chamber of Judicial Executors may appear in court in its own name and whether it has procedural standing in disputes over acts issued by judicial executors who no longer practice. The referral was rejected because it did not meet the admissibility conditions for a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 519 of the Civil Procedure Code, and the decision is binding under Article 521(3) of the same code; no substantive ruling on the standing issue was issued, and the underlying case remains pending.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary ruling request on judicial executor chamber's standing ruled inadmissible: The referral was rejected because it did not meet the admissibility conditions for a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 519 of the Civil Procedure Code, and the decision is binding under Article 521(3) of the same code; no substantive ruling on the standing issue was issued, and the underlying case remains pending.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision procedural issues article of civil procedure grounds for cassation standing of heirs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
This provision governs the mandatory effect of the decision, as cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 26/2018
Bailiffs chamber standing referral inadmissible for lack of specific norm and decisiveness.
ICCJ_132488
Referral on judicial executor fees for intuitu personae obligations declared inadmissible
ICCJ_119323
Inadmissibility of request for preliminary ruling on jurisdiction and appealability of revision against Preliminary Chamber Judge orders
ICCJ_203004
Preliminary ruling referral on limitation in preliminary chamber ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 45/2021
Preliminary ruling referral deemed inadmissible for lacking formal statutory requirements.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

This provision governs the mandatory effect of the decision, as cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 26 Dosar nr. 3464/1/2017

Şedinţa din 16 aprilie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Caraş-Severin - Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 1721/208/2016 referitoare la pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind: „analiza posibilităţii ca instituţia Camerei Executorilor Judecătoreşti să stea în instanţă, în nume propriu, respectiv verificarea calităţii procesuale a Camerei Executorilor Judecătoreşti în litigiile având ca obiect acte emise de executorii judecătoreşti care nu mai profesează”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 16 aprilie 2018.