Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_141009 AI generated

Definition of Judicial Retirement Date Under Status Law: Office Release vs. Pension Grant

Case Number ICCJ_141009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request by the Bucharest Court of Appeal for a preliminary ruling on a question of law, leaving the lower court's procedures unaffected. The dispute centered on the interpretation of the retirement date under the Judges' and Prosecutors' Status Law, specifically whether it referred to the date of release from office due to retirement or the date pension rights were established by an administrative decision. The court's decisive legal basis for dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility and binding nature of submissions to the Complete Court for Clarification of Legal Issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 82 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2004, art. 82 din Legea nr. 303/2004, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Definition of Judicial Retirement Date Under Status Law: Office Release vs. Pension Grant: The dispute centered on the interpretation of the retirement date under the Judges' and Prosecutors' Status Law, specifically whether it referred to the date of release from office due to retirement or the date pension rights were established by an administrative decision. The court's decisive legal basis for dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility and binding nature of submissions to the Complete Court for Clarification of Legal Issues.

Keywords

AI generated
retirement judicial law legal status administrative status preliminary ruling procedure established right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 82 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2004
„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 82 alin.
art. 82 din Legea nr. 303/2004
„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 82 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling request.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 22/2018
Judicial service pension base: whether "retirement date" is the release decree date or pension decision date
ICCJ_217293
Preliminary referral on judicial service pension eligibility ruled inadmissible on procedural grounds
Decizia nr. 11/2023
Interpretation of judicial seniority: inclusion of mandatory military service period after appointment in pension calculation under special and general public pension laws
ICCJ_228020
Calculation of service pension seniority deadlines and retroactivity of magistrates' status law
Decizia nr. 997/2006
Judicial retirement decision: appeal allowed, judgment quashed, and case remanded

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 3117/1/2017

Şedinţa din 19 martie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 82 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în sensul de a se stabili dacă data pensionării reprezintă data eliberării din funcţie prin pensionare ori data stabilirii drepturilor de pensie prin decizia privind acordarea pensiei de serviciu în baza art. 82 din Legea nr. 303/2004.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 19 martie 2018.