Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_140999 AI generated

Pension house may issue enforceable debt decision to recover benefits after underlying judgment quashed on appeal.

Case Number ICCJ_140999
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal and, in a preliminary ruling for the uniform interpretation of law, established that, under Article 179(4) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unitary public pension system, a pension house may directly recover sums paid as social insurance benefits pursuant to a court judgment that was later quashed on appeal, by issuing a debt decision that constitutes an enforceable title. The dispute arose in a labor and social insurance case where the pension house sought recovery of benefits after the underlying judgment was overturned; the Court thus held that no separate court action is required for such recovery. The ruling is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and was pronounced in a public hearing on 5 March 2018.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 179 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension house may issue enforceable debt decision to recover benefits after underlying judgment quashed on appeal: 263/2010 on the unitary public pension system, a pension house may directly recover sums paid as social insurance benefits pursuant to a court judgment that was later quashed on appeal, by issuing a debt decision that constitutes an enforceable title. The dispute arose in a labor and social insurance case where the pension house sought recovery of benefits after the underlying judgment was overturned; the Court thus held that no separate court action is required for such recovery. The ruling is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and was pronounced in a public hearing on 5 March 2018.

Keywords

AI generated
social insurance dispute enforceable decision recovery of debts interpretation of a judgment seizure of pension benefits insurance benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 179 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Main ground for the decision: interpretation of this provision on recovery of sums paid as social insurance benefits after annulment of a court decision.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision applied in the dispositive to declare the decision binding.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 15/2018
Recovery of pension benefits paid under overturned court judgment via administrative debit decision as enforceable title
ICCJ_136823
Pension debt recovery condition: validity of recovery decisions contingent on prior suspension of pension payments under social insurance law
Decizia nr. 1850/2022
Pension credit challenge against county pension house rulings quashed as appeal inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 2039/2020
Pension back-payment arrears: Enforceability of social security judgments and refusal of suspension due to lack of budgetary funds
Decizia nr. 1836/2020
Suspension of enforcement of pension judgment: proof of imminent prejudice and non-recoverability despite public institution budget limits

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 179 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Main ground for the decision: interpretation of this provision on recovery of sums paid as social insurance benefits after annulment of a court decision.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision applied in the dispositive to declare the decision binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.15 Dosar nr. 3011/1/2017

Şedinţa din 5 martie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București - Secția a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă și asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 1793/93/2016, privind pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabilește că:

În interpretarea dispozițiilor art. 179 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, recuperarea sumelor plătite cu titlu de prestații de asigurări sociale, în temeiul unei hotărâri judecătorești desființate în calea de atac, se poate face de către casa de pensii, în mod direct, prin emiterea unei decizii de debit, care constituie titlu executoriu.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 5 martie 2018.