Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_140166 AI generated

Scope of "public pension system" under Law No. 8/2006 excludes state military pensioners

Case Number ICCJ_140166
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its Special Composition for Legal Interpretation, ruled that the pensioners of the state military pension system are explicitly excluded from the category of "public pension system pensioners" eligible for the allowance under Article 1(1) of Law No. 8/2006. This decision resolved a preliminary reference (hotărâre prealabilă) initiated by the Pitești Court of Appeal, establishing a binding legal interpretation that the term "public pension system" in the context of the 2006 law does not encompass the military pension regime governed by Law No. 223/2015. By definitively interpreting the scope of the eligibility criteria, the court clarified that military pensioners do not qualify for the specific allowance, thereby determining the substantive rights and obligations in cases involving such claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 8/2006, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of "public pension system" under Law No. 8/2006 excludes state military pensioners: 8/2006. This decision resolved a preliminary reference (hotărâre prealabilă) initiated by the Pitești Court of Appeal, establishing a binding legal interpretation that the term "public pension system" in the context of the 2006 law does not encompass the military pension regime governed by Law No. 223/2015. By definitively interpreting the scope of the eligibility criteria, the court clarified that military pensioners do not qualify for the specific allowance, thereby determining the substantive rights and obligations in cases involving such claims.

Keywords

AI generated
pension rights military regime legal systems excluded cases state obligation interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 8/2006
The specific provision whose interpretation was requested and which forms the substantive basis of the court's ruling regarding the exclusion of military pensioners.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
The procedural provision cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 10/2018
Eligibility of military state pensioners for the monthly allowance under the public pension system creators' union law.
Decizia nr. 5113/2019
Pension allowance termination upheld; military pensioners excluded from Law no. 8/2006 allowance.
Decizia nr. 4734/2019
Eligibility of military pensioners for creator allowances: distinction between state military and public pension systems under Law 223/2015 and Law 8/2006
Decizia nr. 2559/2019
Eligibility of military pensioners for creators' allowance under Law 8/2006 following reclassification to state military pension system
ICCJ_232194
Scope of pensioner debt-exemption law: applicability to state military pension recipients

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 1 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 8/2006

The specific provision whose interpretation was requested and which forms the substantive basis of the court's ruling regarding the exclusion of military pensioners.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

The procedural provision cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 2657/1/2017

Şedinţa din 19 februarie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile, formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 984/109/2016* şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

Dispozițiile art. 1 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 8/2006 privind instituirea indemnizației pentru pensionarii sistemului public de pensii, membri ai uniunilor de creatori legal constituite și recunoscute ca persoane juridice de utilitate publică, republicată, se interpretează în sensul că în categoria pensionarilor sistemului public de pensii (în accepțiunea acestei prevederi legale) nu intră și pensionarii sistemului pensiilor militare de stat (Legea nr. 223/2015 privind pensiile militare de stat, cu modificările și completările ulterioare).

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 19 februarie 2018.