Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_140161 AI generated

Admissibility of judicial review of extensions to technical surveillance mandates under criminal procedure

Case Number ICCJ_140161
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling on points of law submitted by the Court of Appeal of Timișoara. The dispute concerned criminal procedural issues regarding the limits of judicial review in technical surveillance cases, specifically whether a preliminary chamber judge could verify the legality of the order extending the measure and whether such an extension could be granted after the expiration of the initial surveillance mandate. The court rejected the referral without addressing the merits, applying Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates the binding force of the decision from the date of publication in the Official Monitor.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Admissibility of judicial review of extensions to technical surveillance mandates under criminal procedure: The dispute concerned criminal procedural issues regarding the limits of judicial review in technical surveillance cases, specifically whether a preliminary chamber judge could verify the legality of the order extending the measure and whether such an extension could be granted after the expiration of the initial surveillance mandate. The court rejected the referral without addressing the merits, applying Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates the binding force of the decision from the date of publication in the Official Monitor.

Keywords

AI generated
limits of judicial review code of criminal procedure procedural review preliminary ruling procedure cassation review preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature and effective date of the court's decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 20/2022
Preliminary ruling on surveillance warrant admissibility found inadmissible for failing statutory conditions.
Decizia nr. 2/2018
Competence of preliminary chamber to review post-expiration extension of technical surveillance mandates
Decizia nr. 22/2016
Technical surveillance warrant execution under clear statutory text; preliminary ruling request inadmissible.
ICCJ_87090
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on appeal against judicial officer's decision on prosecutor's judicial surveillance order
ICCJ_187647
Referral on technical surveillance mandates declared inadmissible

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature and effective date of the court's decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 2 Dosar nr. 3328/1/2017

Şedinţa din data de 08 februarie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara - Secţia penală în dosarul nr. 5190/108/2017/a1 prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a următoarelor chestiuni de drept :

„1) dacă judecătorul de cameră preliminară poate verifica legalitatea încheierii prin care judecătorul de drepturi şi libertăţi a dispus prelungirea măsurii de supraveghere tehnică;

2) dacă prelungirea supravegherii tehnice poate fi dispusă după expirarea mandatului de supraveghere tehnică emis iniţial.”

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 08 februarie 2018.