Interpretation of "credit contracts in progress" for real property surrender under Law No. 77/2016 and admissibility of preliminary ruling request
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Romania dismissed as inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Constanța Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court to resolve the dispute without binding guidance on the specific legal interpretation at issue. The proceeding concerned a civil matter under Law No. 77/2016 regarding the surrender of real property to settle credit obligations, specifically challenging the interpretation of the phrase "credit contracts in progress at the time of its entry into force." The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement for the admissibility of preliminary questions under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was not met by the referring court's submission.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 11 din Legea nr. 77/2016, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Interpretation of "credit contracts in progress" for real property surrender under Law No. 77/2016 and admissibility of preliminary ruling request: The proceeding concerned a civil matter under Law No. 77/2016 regarding the surrender of real property to settle credit obligations, specifically challenging the interpretation of the phrase "credit contracts in progress at the time of its entry into force." The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement for the admissibility of preliminary questions under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was not met by the referring court's submission.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is obligatory for all courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.6 Dosar nr. 2477/1/2017
Şedinţa din 22 ianuarie 2018
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Constanța - Secția a II-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 16817/212/2016, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la chestiunea de drept vizând interpretarea sintagmei „contracte de credit aflate în derulare la momentul intrării sale în vigoare” prevăzută de dispozițiile art. 11 din Legea nr. 77/2016 privind darea în plată a unor bunuri imobile în vederea stingerii obligațiilor asumate prin credite.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 22 ianuarie 2018.