Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_139305 AI generated

Admissibility of referral on legal presumption of capacity versus judicial presumption rebuttal

Case Number ICCJ_139305
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral submitted by the Covasna Tribunal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the underlying civil dispute without a preliminary ruling. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of the legal presumption of legal capacity (capacitate de folosință) versus the possibility of rebutting it through a judicial presumption, specifically in the context of civil capacity and procedural provisions. The decisive legal basis involved Articles 329 and 328(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, read in conjunction with Articles 103 and 53 of the Civil Code, focusing on the interplay and hierarchy between legal and judicial presumptions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral on legal presumption of capacity versus judicial presumption rebuttal: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of the legal presumption of legal capacity (capacitate de folosință) versus the possibility of rebutting it through a judicial presumption, specifically in the context of civil capacity and procedural provisions. The decisive legal basis involved Articles 329 and 328(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, read in conjunction with Articles 103 and 53 of the Civil Code, focusing on the interplay and hierarchy between legal and judicial presumptions.

Keywords

AI generated
legal presumption legal capacity procedural capacity preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code interest in bringing an action

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish that the decision is binding, fulfilling the procedural requirement for finality in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 10/2022
Inadmissibility of constitutional referral regarding cassation scope post-admissibility decision
Decizia nr. 3526/2018
Admissibility of constitutional referral under Law No. 47/1992: lack of causal link to case outcome and challenge to non-constitutional text
ICCJ_230688
Inadmissibility of referrals for the resolution of legal questions due to procedural defects
ICCJ_123246
Admissibility of referral for resolution of legal questions (chestiuni de drept)
ICCJ_230787
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on interplay between administrative procedural competence and civil standing provisions

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish that the decision is binding, fulfilling the procedural requirement for finality in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.5 Dosar nr. 2195/1/2017

Şedinţa din 22 ianuarie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Covasna - Secția civilă, în dosarul nr. 161/248/2014, privind pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile referitoare la modul de interpretare și aplicare a dispozițiilor art. 329 din Codul de procedură civilă, coroborate cu art. 103 din Codul civil, ale art. 53 din Codul civil, coroborate cu art. 328 alin. (2) din Codul de procedură civilă, vizând prezumția legală a capacității de folosință, posibilitatea înlăturării acesteia prin aplicarea unei prezumții judiciare, precum și raportul între cele două tipuri de prezumții.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 22 ianuarie 2018.